Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Does the reactivity series of metals hold true for organic compounds?

  1. Mar 17, 2014 #1
    I've learnt that a more active metal displaces a less reactive one. So, according to the reactivity series Ca cannot displace Na but in he reaction given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_scum
    Na is displaced by Ca.
    What is the reason for this exception?
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 17, 2014 #2
    I am afraid you are wrong. ''Na'' is not replaced by Ca but Na+ is getting replaced by Ca+2. The reason for this displacement reaction is given by Fajan's rule. Fajan's rule states that lesser the size of cation, more stable is the compound/ionic salt. So here, size of calcium cation is lesser than sodium cation and hence greater product stability, thus the product.

    Reactivity series applies to (Metal + Other compound) kind of reactions.

    Eg: Na + H2O = NaOH + 1/2H2
  4. Mar 21, 2014 #3
    But if we have reactions like CuSO4 + Na → Na2SO4 + Cu
    In such reactions we have Cu in the ion form i.e. Cu2+. So in this reaction aren't the cations of copper displaced?
  5. Mar 21, 2014 #4
    Yeah. But, the one displacing it, i.e sodium is in the form of metal.
  6. Mar 21, 2014 #5


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This is rather bad example. Better one will be

    2AgNO3 + Cu → Cu(NO3)2 + 2Ag

    or, in the net ionic form

    2Ag+ + Cu → Cu2+ + 2Ag
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Does the reactivity series of metals hold true for organic compounds?
  1. Metal Reactivity (Replies: 2)

  2. Reactivity series (Replies: 4)