Does This Sequence Converge Given the Conditions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the convergence of a sequence \( x_n \) under the condition \( |x_n - x_{n+1}| \leq \frac{1}{3n} \) for all \( n = 1, 2, \ldots \). The definition of convergence provided states that a sequence \( \{a_n\} \) converges to \( A \) if for every \( \epsilon > 0 \), there exists a positive integer \( N \) such that for all \( n \geq N \), \( |a_n - A| < \epsilon \). The concept of Cauchy sequences is introduced, emphasizing that a sequence is Cauchy if for any \( \epsilon > 0 \), there exists an \( N \) such that \( |x_n - x_m| < \epsilon \) for all \( n, m > N \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequence convergence and its formal definition.
  • Familiarity with Cauchy sequences and their properties.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction.
  • Proficiency in manipulating inequalities and limits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cauchy sequences in detail.
  • Learn how to apply the definition of convergence to various sequences.
  • Explore proofs of convergence using the epsilon-delta definition.
  • Investigate the relationship between Cauchy sequences and convergence in metric spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis and sequence convergence, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Cauchy sequences and their implications in mathematical proofs.

Matt B.
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

: [/B]Prove that if xn is a sequence such that |xn - xn+1| ≤ (1/3n), for all n = 1,2,..., then it converges.

Homework Equations

: [/B]The definition of convergence.

The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B] I attempted to prove this by induction, so I am clearly far off the mark here. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good start would be to write down your definition of convergence. All the hints that are likely to be needed are in that definition.
 
Our definition of convergence provided is the following:

{an} converges to A if ∀ε>0, ∃a positive integer N such that n ≥ N => | an - A | < ε.

I'm not sure how I am supposed to use this in the example above?
 
Matt B. said:
Our definition of convergence provided is the following:

{an} converges to A if ∀ε>0, ∃a positive integer N such that n ≥ N => | an - A | < ε.

I'm not sure how I am supposed to use this in the example above?

Have you ever heard of Cauchy sequences?
 
Ray Vickson said:
Have you ever heard of Cauchy sequences?
Yes.
 
Matt B. said:
Yes.

OK... so?
 
Ray Vickson said:
OK... so?

Do I just assume that xn can be substituted for the usual xn and that xn+1 be substituted for xm and attempt to find the n,n+1 ≥ N such that | xn - xn+1 | < ε, given ε > 0?
 
Matt B. said:
Do I just assume that xn can be substituted for the usual xn and that xn+1 be substituted for xm and attempt to find the n,n+1 ≥ N such that | xn - xn+1 | < ε, given ε > 0?

No, that is not what a Cauchy sequence is all about. A sequence is Cauchy if, given any ##\epsilon > 0## there is an ##N = N(\epsilon)## such that ##|x_n - x_m|< \epsilon## for all ##n,m > N##. Note that this is ##|x_n - x_m|##, not just ##|x_n - x_{n+1}|##.

You might guess that if I mention Cauchy sequences, that must be for a good reason.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K