Does This Sequence Converge Given the Conditions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of a sequence defined by the condition |xn - xn+1| ≤ (1/3n). Participants are exploring the implications of this condition in the context of convergence definitions and Cauchy sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the definition of convergence to the sequence and question how to utilize it effectively. There is a discussion about the nature of Cauchy sequences and their relevance to the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints regarding the definition of convergence and the concept of Cauchy sequences. There is an ongoing exploration of how these concepts relate to the original problem, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and conditions necessary for proving convergence, and there is a mention of the need to clarify the distinction between the conditions for convergence and those for Cauchy sequences.

Matt B.
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

: [/B]Prove that if xn is a sequence such that |xn - xn+1| ≤ (1/3n), for all n = 1,2,..., then it converges.

Homework Equations

: [/B]The definition of convergence.

The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B] I attempted to prove this by induction, so I am clearly far off the mark here. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good start would be to write down your definition of convergence. All the hints that are likely to be needed are in that definition.
 
Our definition of convergence provided is the following:

{an} converges to A if ∀ε>0, ∃a positive integer N such that n ≥ N => | an - A | < ε.

I'm not sure how I am supposed to use this in the example above?
 
Matt B. said:
Our definition of convergence provided is the following:

{an} converges to A if ∀ε>0, ∃a positive integer N such that n ≥ N => | an - A | < ε.

I'm not sure how I am supposed to use this in the example above?

Have you ever heard of Cauchy sequences?
 
Ray Vickson said:
Have you ever heard of Cauchy sequences?
Yes.
 
Matt B. said:
Yes.

OK... so?
 
Ray Vickson said:
OK... so?

Do I just assume that xn can be substituted for the usual xn and that xn+1 be substituted for xm and attempt to find the n,n+1 ≥ N such that | xn - xn+1 | < ε, given ε > 0?
 
Matt B. said:
Do I just assume that xn can be substituted for the usual xn and that xn+1 be substituted for xm and attempt to find the n,n+1 ≥ N such that | xn - xn+1 | < ε, given ε > 0?

No, that is not what a Cauchy sequence is all about. A sequence is Cauchy if, given any ##\epsilon > 0## there is an ##N = N(\epsilon)## such that ##|x_n - x_m|< \epsilon## for all ##n,m > N##. Note that this is ##|x_n - x_m|##, not just ##|x_n - x_{n+1}|##.

You might guess that if I mention Cauchy sequences, that must be for a good reason.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K