Does time period of SHM vary with frame(inertial and non inertial)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time period of simple harmonic motion (SHM) as observed from different reference frames, specifically comparing inertial and non-inertial frames. The original poster questions whether the time period perceived by two observers—one in an inertial frame and the other in a non-inertial frame—will differ.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of non-relativistic speeds on the observations of SHM. Questions arise regarding the constancy of acceleration for the non-inertial observer and how this might affect the perceived frequency of the oscillator. There is also a discussion about the definition of "period of oscillation" from different observational perspectives.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the question, considering various scenarios and assumptions. Some have provided insights into the relationship between the observers' speeds and the time period observed, while others are questioning the definitions and conditions under which the observations are made.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on non-relativistic conditions, and the discussion includes considerations of what it means to "observe" SHM, which may vary based on the type of oscillator being considered.

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Does time period of SHM vary with frame(inertial and non inertial)??

Homework Statement



There is an SHM. First observer is watching it from inertial frame of refrence and secodn is from non inertial will there any change of time period for both observer.

Homework Equations



just think about it.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done a question on SHM. that was solved example first i do that with my self with non inertial frame of reference and then when i see it in book it was done by inertial frame. However my answer was matching with answer of the book.

After i think on it. I come to conclusion that speed is not too fast so clock of both observer run with same speed hence both observers will see it with same time period..
thanks..
waiting for your response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


So... we're assuming non-relativistic speeds, and the question is whether two observers (one being accelerated) will see the same frequency for the SHM oscillator? One important thing is whether the acceleration of the observer is constant with time or not.
 


BruceW said:
So... we're assuming non-relativistic speeds, and the question is whether two observers (one being accelerated) will see the same frequency for the SHM oscillator? One important thing is whether the acceleration of the observer is constant with time or not.[/color]

consider both the cases.then??
 


hmm. For a physical object oscillating in space, you need to say what you mean by the period of oscillation, because from the point of view of the accelerated observer, the oscillator might never repeat its motion.

For some more abstract oscillator like an electrical circuit, it is more simple. In this case, I think you were right that:
vkash said:
After i think on it. I come to conclusion that speed is not too fast so clock of both observer run with same speed hence both observers will see it with same time period..
 


Also depends on what "watching" means precisely. "Observing" sound waves might not be the same as "watching" a pendulum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K