Does Traveling Through a Wormhole Violate the Law of Conservation of Mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of traveling through a wormhole on the Law of Conservation of Mass. It concludes that while a wormhole allows for the transfer of mass between two points in spacetime, it does not violate conservation laws. When an object with mass enters a wormhole, the mass of the wormhole increases correspondingly, ensuring that the total mass remains constant. The concept of time dilation is also introduced, explaining how traveling at relativistic speeds affects the passage of time between two connected wormholes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and spacetime concepts
  • Familiarity with the Law of Conservation of Mass
  • Basic knowledge of time dilation and its effects in physics
  • Concept of wormholes and their theoretical implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of general relativity and its implications for wormholes
  • Study the principles of time dilation and its effects on relativistic travel
  • Explore the theoretical models of wormholes and their potential for time travel
  • Investigate the current scientific consensus on the conservation laws in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of wormholes on fundamental laws of nature.

permapoop
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm going to apologize now if what I say doesn't really make sense, I'm still only learning the basics of physics.

Let's say that few hundred or maybe thousands of years, we developed some sort of device that can rip a hole into the space time fabric to create a wormhole. If a spaceship, satellite, or anything goes through that wormhole, wouldn't that object(s) technically not be in our dimension/realm anymore? Therefore, wouldn't that violate the Law of Conservation of Mass? Or if it doesn't violate it, how come?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you could build a pair of connected wormholes going through one would lead you to come out of the other. You would not leave the universe.

Interestingly you can build a time machine with two wormholes. If you accelerate one up close to the speed of light, let it fly for a while and bring it back it will be a gateway to the future for the other one. If you fixed the wormholes to walls with a synchronised clock on them the clocks will always tick at the same speed and show the same time. However the one that was accelerated to close to the speed of light will have undergone time dilation.

If the accelerated one (A) went on a 30 year journey (according to some one on Earth) that took just 10 years according to it's clock then the other wormhole (B) would be separated from it by 20 years. If you step into A you come out 20 years in the past out of B and vis versa.

This doesn't break the conservation of mass however (until yesterday I thought it might until it was [post=3266979] explained to me[/post]) because when X mass enters one wormhole it increases the wormhole by X mass and decreases the wormhole it comes out of by X mass.

So if wormhole A and B mass 1000kg and I (massing 100kg) walk through A I have transferred 100kg from the future to the past. However A will now mass 1100kg and B will mass 900kg.
 
permapoop said:
I'm going to apologize now if what I say doesn't really make sense, I'm still only learning the basics of physics.

Let's say that few hundred or maybe thousands of years, we developed some sort of device that can rip a hole into the space time fabric to create a wormhole. If a spaceship, satellite, or anything goes through that wormhole, wouldn't that object(s) technically not be in our dimension/realm anymore? Therefore, wouldn't that violate the Law of Conservation of Mass? Or if it doesn't violate it, how come?

A wormhole would lead to another part of the universe, but it would still be IN our universe. But, if something happened where we observed matter or energy dissappearing or appearing from something that couldn't be explained by anything other than other dimensions/universes, we would have to change our theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K