Does Using Inertia Help or Hinder Weight Lifting?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter douglis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifting Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of inertia in weight lifting, particularly focusing on the phases of acceleration and deceleration during lifts. Participants explore whether less force is applied during the deceleration phase and the implications of this on lifting techniques and muscle training.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether less force than the weight is applied during the deceleration phase of lifting.
  • There is a discussion about the direction of net acceleration when upward velocity decreases, with some asserting that net acceleration acts downward, indicating a negative net force.
  • One participant suggests that providing resistance throughout the deceleration phase is important to prevent injury.
  • Another participant emphasizes that inertia plays a significant role in lifting, especially in overcoming sticking points, while also noting that controlled lifting may be preferable for muscle training.
  • Some participants mention that lifting the most weight often involves attempting to lift as explosively as possible, which can lead to rattling of plates at lower weights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of force during the deceleration phase and the role of inertia in lifting techniques. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to lifting, with some advocating for controlled movements while others support the use of inertia to maximize weight lifted.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference studies regarding lifting techniques and the effects of inertia, but specific details or sources are not provided. The discussion includes assumptions about the phases of lifting and the definitions of terms like "deceleration phase."

douglis
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
when you try to lift explosively a weight there is a acceleration phase and obviously a deceleration phase in order to stop the weight at the end of range of motion(end of repetition).
Is it alright to assume that at the deceleration phase less force than the weight is applied?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
douglis said:
Hi all,
when you try to lift explosively a weight there is a acceleration phase and obviously a deceleration phase in order to stop the weight at the end of range of motion(end of repetition).
Is it alright to assume that at the deceleration phase less force than the weight is applied?

Why assume?

In which direction is the net acceleration acting if the upward velocity is decreasing?
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Why assume?

In which direction is the net acceleration acting if the upward velocity is decreasing?

The net acceleration is acting downward so the net force must be negative...so the force that is applied is less than the weight.Right?
 
douglis said:
The net acceleration is acting downward so the net force must be negative...so the force that is applied is less than the weight.Right?

It sounds like you already know but don't trust the math. :biggrin:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
It sounds like you already know but don't trust the math. :biggrin:

Yes...for some reason(...long story) I had to play the stupid and ask an obvious question.
Anyway...thanks for answering.
 
douglis said:
The net acceleration is acting downward so the net force must be negative...so the force that is applied is less than the weight.Right?

You already know the answer.
Positive net force(force applied greater than the weight) causes acceleration and negative net force(force applied less than the weight) causes deceleration.
 
When lifting, you generally want to provide resistance to the "deceleration" all the way down, not just at the end.
 
Galteeth said:
When lifting, you generally want to provide resistance to the "deceleration" all the way down, not just at the end.

Absolutely. Using this technique can prevent injury. Allowing the weight to so something like a free fall is a good way to mess up a joint.
 
Galteeth said:
When lifting, you generally want to provide resistance to the "deceleration" all the way down, not just at the end.

By deceleration phase I meant the ending part of the lifting phase(not the lowering) where you have to decelerate the weight in order to prevent it "fly" from your hands.
For that part the applied force must be less than the weight.
 
  • #10
douglis said:
By deceleration phase I meant the ending part of the lifting phase(not the lowering) where you have to decelerate the weight in order to prevent it "fly" from your hands.
For that part the applied force must be less than the weight.

right. I misunderstood because in your OP you said "at the end of the repetition" and I would consider both the lifting and the lowering to constitute one rep.
 
  • #11
douglis said:
By deceleration phase I meant the ending part of the lifting phase(not the lowering) where you have to decelerate the weight in order to prevent it "fly" from your hands.
For that part the applied force must be less than the weight.

i try to avoid doing this, though. the trick is to not let go. :wink:

studies have shown (not sure i could dig it up on cue) that you lift the most weight when you're attempting to go as fast as possible. at a lower weight, this means the plates will rattle from the sudden deceleration at the top. as weight increases, it smooths out.

but, yeah, inertia is a major part of lifting. without it, you just wouldn't make it through those sticking points without lowering the weight.
 
  • #12
Proton Soup said:
i try to avoid doing this, though. the trick is to not let go. :wink:

studies have shown (not sure i could dig it up on cue) that you lift the most weight when you're attempting to go as fast as possible. at a lower weight, this means the plates will rattle from the sudden deceleration at the top. as weight increases, it smooths out.

but, yeah, inertia is a major part of lifting. without it, you just wouldn't make it through those sticking points without lowering the weight.

Sure...if you goal is to lift the heaviest weight as possible you should take advantage of the inertia.But if you just want to train your muscles you should let them do the job and not count on the inertia.Therefore I prefer a more controlled lifting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
18K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K