Does W Qualify as a Subspace of R^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a set W, defined by specific conditions on vectors in R^3, qualifies as a subspace. The conditions include relationships between the components of the vectors, specifically a = 3b, a ≤ b ≤ c, and ab = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions and axioms related to vector addition and scalar multiplication in the context of subspaces. There is a focus on whether the conditions defining W hold under these operations. Questions arise regarding the implications of negative scalars and the independence of the conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the validity of assumptions made about vector operations and the implications of the conditions defining W. Some guidance has been offered regarding the necessary checks to determine if W is a subspace, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of verifying that both vector addition and scalar multiplication yield results that satisfy the conditions defining W. There is an acknowledgment of potential misunderstandings regarding the nature of the conditions and their interdependencies.

Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8
Moved from technical math section, so missing the HW templage
Determine whether or not W is a subspace of R^3, where W consists of all vectors (a, b, c) in R^3 such that (a) a = 3b; (b) a<=b<=c; (c) ab = 0.

a) Because vectors (a,b,c) can assume any value in W, W is a subset of R^3. Also, the zero vector belongs to W and W is closed under vector addition (a,b,c are elements of W, a+b+c belongs to W) and scalar multiplication (a,b,c belong to W, k belongs to K and k(a,b,c) belongs to W.

Please give input on my statement (a).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robb said:
W is closed under vector addition (a,b,c are elements of W, a+b+c belongs to W)
That is not what the vector addition axiom is about. a,b,c are components, not vectors. The vector addition axiom requires that, if (a,b,c) and (d,e,f) are both in W, then their sum, which is (a+d, b+e, c+f) is also in W.
Robb said:
a,b,c belong to W, k belongs to K and k(a,b,c) belongs to W
Are you sure? What if k is negative?
 
andrewkirk said:
That is not what the vector addition axiom is about. a,b,c are components, not vectors. The vector addition axiom requires that, if (a,b,c) and (d,e,f) are both in W, then their sum, which is (a+d, b+e, c+f) is also in W.
Are you sure? What if k is negative?

I guess I assumed "where W consists of all vectors (a,b,c)" is saying they are vectors. So, may I make assumptions with this problem as you did above with (a,b,c) and (c,d,e)? If so, what does that tell me about (a) a=3b?
 
Robb said:
I guess I assumed "where W consists of all vectors (a,b,c)" is saying they are vectors.
There is more to that sentence - "such that (a) a = 3b; (b) a<=b<=c; (c) ab = 0."

Take two arbitrary vectors in W. Add them. Is their sum also in W? I.e., does this sum satisfy the three conditions above.
Take an arbitrary vector in W and an arbitrary constant. Multiply them. Is this new vector also in W? Again, it has to satisfy the same three conditions.

These are what you have to do to show that W is a subspace of R3. If either one or both of the above fail, W is not a subspace of R3.
 
Mark44 said:
There is more to that sentence - "such that (a) a = 3b; (b) a<=b<=c; (c) ab = 0."

Take two arbitrary vectors in W. Add them. Is their sum also in W? I.e., does this sum satisfy the three conditions above.
Take an arbitrary vector in W and an arbitrary constant. Multiply them. Is this new vector also in W? Again, it has to satisfy the same three conditions.

These are what you have to do to show that W is a subspace of R3. If either one or both of the above fail, W is not a subspace of R3.
I thought these were three independent questions as the book gives three independent answers. I was looking at each individually.
 
Robb said:
I thought these were three independent questions as the book gives three independent answers. I was looking at each individually.
OK, I misunderstood what the question was.
For (a), W = {(a, b, c) | a = 3b}
Take two arbitrary vectors u and v in W. Add them. Is their sum u + v also in W?
Take an arbitrary vector u in W and a scalar k. Is ku in W?
Do the same for the other two parts of the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K