Does weight of an object chance in uniform upwmotionard motion

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trojan666ru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Uniform Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of weight in the context of uniform upward motion. Participants explore whether the weight of an object changes when it is moved upwards at a constant velocity, specifically addressing the implications of gravitational force and the definitions of weight and mass.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if an object weighs 10 kg at rest, it will still weigh 10 kg when moving upwards at a uniform velocity of 5 m/s, as no acceleration is involved.
  • Others propose that the weight could be calculated based on the gravitational force at different altitudes, suggesting that weight is a function of distance from the center of the Earth.
  • A participant questions whether weight increases or decreases when moving away from Earth, emphasizing that they are not interested in the inverse square law effects.
  • Some argue that while moving at constant velocity, the weight remains unchanged, drawing parallels to experiences in elevators where weight changes only during acceleration or deceleration.
  • Another viewpoint introduces general relativity, suggesting that moving against the flow of gravity might result in an increase in weight, although this interpretation is challenged by others.
  • There is a clarification that weight is defined as the force due to gravity acting on an object, which is distinct from mass.
  • Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between colloquial and scientific definitions of weight and mass, with some emphasizing that weight should be understood in terms of force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the weight of an object changes during uniform upward motion. Multiple competing views are presented, particularly regarding the definitions of weight and the effects of gravitational force at different altitudes.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various interpretations of weight, mass, and gravitational effects, with some participants referencing general relativity and others focusing on classical mechanics. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of different physical theories in this context.

Trojan666ru
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
If i measure a weight on Earth without moving in any
direction, it weighs 10kg. Suppose I'm moving upwards in
a uniform velocity 5m/s , how much would object weigh
now ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the ratio between present gravitational force to initial gravitational force.
If we call r the initial distance from the center of the Earth, r+vt (where v is the velocity you move away with), you should be able to calculate for yourself that ratio of weights, as a function of time.
 
actually i don't want to calculate how much it would increase, i want to make sure the weight increases or not? because I'm moving in an uniform velocity
 
Do you think it would increase or decrease when you move away from the Earth?
 
it would decrease, but I'm not asking about inverse square law. Imagine I'm moving upto a height of 10 km, consider the attractive force of Earth is same at sea level upto 10km, what about now, does the weight of the object increase if I'm moving upwards with uniform velocity of any speed, or the object weigh same 10kg since I'm not accelerating?
 
Trojan666ru said:
If i measure a weight on Earth without moving in any direction, it weighs 10kg. Suppose I'm moving upwards in a uniform velocity 5m/s , how much would object weigh now ??
Since you used the colloquial definition of weight, a synonym for mass, the answer is simple: It "weighs" 10 kg, anywhere and everywhere.

That colloquial meaning is not what physicists and engineers mean they talk about "weight". Physicists use the word "mass" to denote mass. Why use the word "weight" when there is already a perfectly good word for mass? Weight in physics has units of force in physics. There are two widely used definitions: The force due to gravitation on the object (mass times gravitational acceleration), and the total of all forces acting on the object except for gravitation.

What arildno is hinting at is mass times acceleration, or Newton's universal law of gravitation. What does that have to say about the force due to gravitation as altitude increases?
 
Trojan666ru said:
actually i don't want to calculate how much it would increase, i want to make sure the weight increases or not? because I'm moving in an uniform velocity

Using "weight" in the precise sense of being what a spring scale underfoot would read...

Aside from a tiny effect from inverse square law as you may move away from the center of the earth, the weight will not change if you're climbing at a constant velocity. It will change if you're accelerating or decelerating, so not climbing at a constant velocity.

Have you ever taken a fast elevator in a tall building? As the elevator first starts moving upwards you feel a slight increase in weight; you're accelerating upwards. As the elevator settles down to a steady upwards climb your weight returns to normal (no acceleration) and then as it slows to a stop at the top of the climb you feel momentarily lighter.

Of course the force of gravity on your body is the same throughout, as is your mass; what's changing is the force between you and the floor of the elevator, what we strictly mean by "weight".
 
here I'm strictly talking about weight, not mass, consider the mass does not vary because I'm moving with the mass. Weight is the product of mass and g. Here I'm in a lift and the lift goes up with no acceleration, I've an electrical balance which shows exact weight of the object while in not moving and when i move with uniform velocity upwards, i think the the balance will show an increase in weight
 
Trojan666ru said:
here I'm strictly talking about weight, not mass, consider the mass does not vary because I'm moving with the mass. Weight is the product of mass and g. Here I'm in a lift and the lift goes up with no acceleration, I've an electrical balance which shows exact weight of the object while in not moving and when i move with uniform velocity upwards, i think the the balance will show an increase in weight

If you are moving at a constant velocity upwards, the electric balance will not show an increase in weight. (Your post #8 landed just one minute after my post #7, they may have crossed).
 
  • #10
But according to general relativity gravity is the downward flow of spacetime, if i move opposite to the flow of gravity it must feel an increase in weight
 
  • #11
Trojan666ru said:
here I'm strictly talking about weight, not mass, consider the mass does not vary because I'm moving with the mass.
Then why did you persist in saying the weight is 10 kg? Kilograms are a unit of mass, not force.

Weight is the product of mass and g.
That is not the definition of weight used in general relativity (your next post, below). In general relativity, "weight" is what an ideal (spring) scale measures. That's all real forces except gravitation (Newtonian interpretation), or all real forces, period (general relativistic interpretation). Gravitation is not a real force in general relativity.

Trojan666ru said:
But according to general relativity gravity is the downward flow of spacetime, if i move opposite to the flow of gravity it must feel an increase in weight
Where did you get this idea?
 
  • #12
Trojan666ru said:
But according to general relativity gravity is the downward flow of spacetime, if i move opposite to the flow of gravity it must feel an increase in weight

That's not what GR says gravity is, but this doesn't matter because GR itself is basically irrelevant in a situation in which the effects of the Newtonian inverse-square law are small enough to ignore.

This is really just an ##F=ma## problem. We're climbing at a constant velocity, so ##a=0##. Therefore ##F## is zero, which can only happen if the downwards force of gravity on our body is exactly balanced by the upwards force on our feet from the scale we're standing on.
 
  • #13
Trojan666ru said:
If i measure a weight on Earth without moving in any
direction, it weighs 10kg. Suppose I'm moving upwards in
a uniform velocity 5m/s , how much would object weigh
now ??

10kg. You must accelerate or de-accelerate for the scale reading to change. You can test this in an elevator. Scale reading will change at the beginning and end of the ride.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K