Doesnt information travel faster than light in case of black holes?

rahuljayanthb
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi,
i was wondering,
for a black hole, as everyone knows,the escape velocity is greater than light.
this means that the information about the existence of the black hole in terms of light never reaches the observer.
so if the black hole were the cease to exist at an instant of time, the observer will never see the event happening. He will only feel the instantaneous change in the gravitational field. so in a way both gravity and information has traveled faster than light.

an alternative way of considering the same problem would be by expressing gravitational force to be transferred by gravitons. in this case the gravitons reach the observer but the photons don't. so gravitons can escape the gravitational field or 'climb over' the curvature of space time while photons cannot.
so gravitons can be considered to travel faster than the escape velocity giving the same consequences as the first case.

where is my thought process incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rahuljayanthb said:
so if the black hole were the cease to exist at an instant of time, the observer will never see the event happening. He will only feel the instantaneous change in the gravitational field. so in a way both gravity and information has traveled faster than light.

None of this is possible or correct. Gravity does not travel instantaneous, that was the whole point of General Relativity.
 
Pengwuino said:
None of this is possible or correct. Gravity does not travel instantaneous, that was the whole point of General Relativity.
so what is the explanation or correct thought process for this?
 
rahuljayanthb said:
so what is the explanation or correct thought process for this?

As far as what happens if a black hole were to all of a sudden cease existing, there is no explanation because that's not possible. There is something to be said about information that passes into a black hole though ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_loss_paradox ).
 
rahuljayanthb said:
He will only feel the instantaneous change in the gravitational field.
During black hole formation there is no instantaneous change in the gravitational field. Gravitational waves are generated during the collaps outside / before the formation of an event horizon. In perfectly symmetric collaps w/o gravitational radiation for an outside observer the gravitational field does not change at all, the Schwarzschild metric is stationary.

rahuljayanthb said:
so in a way both gravity and information has traveled faster than light.
No. The Schwarzschild metric is stationary, and gravitational waves generated during the collaps outside / before the formation of an event horizon travel with v=c.

rahuljayanthb said:
an alternative way of considering the same problem would be by expressing gravitational force to be transferred by gravitons. in this case the gravitons reach the observer but the photons don't.
It's a common misconception to think that gravity is mediated solely by gravitational waves (gravitons - which we don't need b/c we do not quantize gravity here).

Compare that to electrodynamics and QED: there is a well-known and exact formulation of QED where by integrating out unphysical i.e. gauge degrees of freedom one finds a Hamiltonian consisting of
1) a stationary Coulomb potential for charge densities plus
2) fluctuations i.e. transversal photons.
So there is a stationary Coulomb potential which does not rely on any photon to be exchanged. In addition one can prove explicitly that this formulation is fully Lorentz covariant (even so the stationary Coulomb term looks strange; the algebra of all Lorentz generators closes w/o anomalies, showing manifest Lorentz covariance in the QED Hilbert space).

Something similar is known in gravity. If you look at the effective gravitational potential used for the calculation of perihelion precession it looks like an instantaneous Newtonian potential plus (instantaneous) correction terms; but of course there is no instantaneous interaction; the formulation does neither break symmetries of GR nor does it violate c a s universal upper bound for physical interactions.

rahuljayanthb said:
so gravitons can escape the gravitational field or 'climb over' the curvature of space time while photons cannot.
As explained gravitons neither can not need 'climb over' the curvature of space time; the external gravitational field is not generated by gravitational waves leaving the black hole but is nothing else but the gravitationsl field that already existed before the collapse.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top