Doppler effect: Moving source with reflection

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Doppler effect experienced by two listeners, L1 and L2, in relation to a moving sound source S and a stationary wall. Listener L1, moving with the source, perceives a frequency that is Doppler-shifted approximately twice as much as listener L2, who is stationary by the wall. The frequency observed by L1 is derived from the sound waves compressed in front of the moving source, resulting in a frequency equation that simplifies to approximately 2f_{L_2} when the source speed is close to the speed of sound. The conversation clarifies the distinction between the final frequency and the shift, emphasizing that the shift for L1 is about 2v_S/v for small speeds. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of calculating Doppler shifts in different scenarios involving moving sources and reflections.
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Suppose a sound source S is moving towards a stationary wall and that a listener L1 is moving with the sound source. Describe in a few lines why the reflected sound heard by the listener L1 is Doppler-shifted by about twice the amount that a second listener L2 would hear standing by the wall.

The sound waves in front of the moving source are compressed causing an apparent increase in frequency to f_{L_2} = \frac{v}{v - v_S}f_S, where v is the speed of sound. The sound reflected from the wall has the same frequency f_{L_2}. L1 is approaching the wall with speed v_S, so the relative speed of the wavefronts of sound is v + v_S. The frequency observed by L1 is f_{L_1} = \frac{v + v_S}{v}f_{L_2} = \frac{v + v_S}{v - v_S}f_{S} which is approximately equal to 2f_{L_2} for v_S close to v. Does this answer make sense, or is it unnecessarily complicated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not quite right. Your expression certainly does NOT reduce to 2 fs for vs close to v.

But you're asked about the shift, not the final frequency.
 
The equation does reduce to 2f_{L_2} look at the equation again. It seems pretty clear to me that the question is asking about the final effect of the doppler shift on the original frequency f_{L_2}. Could you explain what you mean by this?

Edit: 2f_S should be 2f_{L_2}
 
Last edited:
It appears that you misread my original post. The frequency reduces to 2f_{L_2}, not 2f_S.
 
Your equation is:

f_{L_1} = \frac{v + v_S}{v - v_S}f_{S}

This is the equation for the frequency f_{L_1}, and not the shift, which would be

f_{L_1} - f_S = \left(\frac{1 + v_S/v}{1 - v_S/v} - 1\right)f_S

Simplifying, we get:

f_{L_1} - f_S = \frac{1 + v_S/v - (1 - v_S/v)}{1 - v_S/v}f_S = \frac{2 v_S/v}{1 - v_S/v}

For v_S << v, we can see that the shift is approximately 2 v_S/v.

If, on the other hand, v_S \approx v then the shift becomes very large.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
772
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K