Doppler shift, c, observation, recession, spacetime expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Doppler shift, specifically its relationship with wave frequency changes due to the distance between a signal source and an observer. Participants clarify that while a Doppler shift typically results from relative motion, the apparent cosmological redshift observed in the universe is attributed to the expansion of space, as explained by general relativity. The distinction between "increasing distance" and "increasing space" is highlighted as both terms can be ambiguous in the context of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Doppler shift principles
  • Familiarity with special relativity concepts
  • Knowledge of general relativity and cosmological redshift
  • Basic grasp of wave frequency and its relation to motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of general relativity and its implications on cosmological redshift
  • Study the mathematical formulation of the Doppler effect in different frames of reference
  • Explore the concept of spacetime and its relevance in modern physics
  • Investigate the observational evidence supporting the expansion of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astronomy enthusiasts, and students studying relativity and cosmology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the implications of the Doppler effect and the expansion of space in the universe.

Bojan Keevill
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

It is my understanding that a Doppler shift is the result of a change in wave frequency due to a change in distance of a signal source, relative to the observer.
I assume that the change in distance must be continuous, in order to observe a Doppler effect:

frequency increase = decreasing distance / time
frequency decrease = increasing distance / time

Assuming this simple explanation is correct, and that the velocity of light is constant for all inertial frames of reference, then no Doppler shift should be observed. However, a Doppler shift (redshift) is apparent.

It is my understanding that the apparent cosmological redshift has given rise to the "expansion of space" hypothesis.

With this in mind I wish to ask what the difference is between:
- increasing distance between signal source and observer
and
- increasing space between signal source and observer

Thanks in advance,
B
 
Space news on Phys.org
It is my understanding that a Doppler shift is the result of a change in wave frequency due to a change in distance of a signal source, relative to the observer.
In special relativity, you have to consider time dilation as well - something like "change in distance in spacetime" (and not just in space).
I assume that the change in distance must be continuous
Motion is always continuous in special relativity.
frequency increase = decreasing distance / time
frequency decrease = increasing distance / time
Not necessarily.
Assuming this simple explanation is correct, and that the velocity of light is constant for all inertial frames of reference, then no Doppler shift should be observed.
Why?
However, a Doppler shift (redshift) is apparent.
The Doppler shift from the expansion of space comes from general relativity, and its contribution is independent of relative motions.
It is my understanding that the apparent cosmological redshift has given rise to the "expansion of space" hypothesis.
Indeed.
With this in mind I wish to ask what the difference is between:
- increasing distance between signal source and observer
and
- increasing space between signal source and observer
Two different words, both are ambiguous in general relativity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K