Geometric Algebra for Physicists, in equation (4.56) introduces the following notation(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

A * B = \langle AB \rangle

[/tex]

as well as (4.57) the commutator product:

[tex]

A \times B = \frac{1}{2}\left(AB - BA\right)

[/tex]

I can see the value defining the commutator product since this selects all the odd grade terms of a product (this can be used to express the othogonal component of a vector with respect to another (rejection), or the othogonal component of a plane with respect to an intersecting plane (or any plane in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex])).

But what's the point of introducing a second notation for grade zero selection? If one is going to introduce an operator to complement the commutator product, then something like the following would make more sense:

[tex]

A * B = \frac{1}{2}\left(AB + BA\right)

[/tex]

ie: select all the even grade components of the product. This is only equivalent to [tex]\langle AB \rangle[/tex] for specific cases like the symmetric vector product (dot product), for intersecting bivectors, for trivectors with bivector intersection, ...

Does anybody else think that this is probably a typo in the text? I haven't been reading this book linearly (skipping back and forth between it and Hestenes NFCM) so I haven't seen where or if either this commutator product or this * product are employed (seeing the usage would probably confirm if this is a typo).

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Doran/Lasenby. Commutator and symmetric products?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**