Dose calculation for oscilloscope

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salman Khan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
Calculating dose from pulse source output recorded by a detector on an oscilloscope is feasible, particularly with ion chambers, where the total charge transferred can be derived from the area under the curve or pulse height. Geiger counters are unsuitable for this purpose, while other detectors may present challenges in interpretation. Commercial PMTs and scintillators may fail due to design limitations, and solid-state detectors could be a viable alternative if calibrated correctly. The discussion highlights concerns about using oscilloscopes for dangerous devices, emphasizing that ion chambers and digital voltmeters are standard for measuring x/gamma radiation doses. Overall, the effectiveness of the measurement method depends on the specific detector and its response time to the pulse duration.
Salman Khan
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
If pulse source output is recorded by a detector on oscilloscope, is it possible to calculate dose from this output voltage pulse?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That depends on the detector and any amplifier. For an ion chamber it would be the total charge transferred, which would be the area under the curve on an oscilloscope trace under some circumstances, or the height of the pulse in others.

A Geiger counter tube would not work. Some other forms of detector might work, but interpreting the result might be challenging.
 
Alex A said:
That depends on the detector and any amplifier. For an ion chamber it would be the total charge transferred, which would be the area under the curve on an oscilloscope trace under some circumstances, or the height of the pulse in others.

A Geiger counter tube would not work. Some other forms of detector might work, but interpreting the result might be challenging.
In case of PMT or other solid state detector?
 
A commercial PMT/Scintillator would probably fail to work. Counters are usually designed with high value resistor chains to save power and with small value capacitors close to the anode. These saturate easily. Spectroscopy grade combinations would probably damage themselves at fairly low exposures.

If you are measuring the dose within the beam I would expect a strong pulse of light from the scintillator. Much more than would be a good fit for a PMT.

A reverse biased diode would probably give a signal, but at these power levels there may be a lot of nonlinear effects. A scintillator connected to a photodiode by a light pipe or fiber optic cable might work well.

I'm bothered that you seem to be trying to reinvent the wheel for instrumentation for a very dangerous device.
 
  • Like
Likes Salman Khan
Dear Alex, very thanks for sharing your experience.
 
Why use an oscilloscope? An ion chamber and a DVM works and is standard for dose measurement of x/gamma radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes Salman Khan
So far as I know ion chamber is gaseous detector having response tim in micro second, how is it possible to measure a pulse dose of nano second pulse using ion chamber ??
 
You didn't say nanoseconds. It works for microseconds for sure. The problem with nsec. pulses is ion recombination. A solid-state detector can be used, I think, instead of an IC, but can be calibrated with a longer pulse width beam relative to an IC.

Just found this for ICs https://www.drct.com/Ion_Chambers/TBM-IC-Pulse-X.html
 
  • Like
Likes Salman Khan
Back
Top