Dose recording on Pocket dosimeter -- Is it accurate for a person's whole body?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the accuracy of pocket dosimeters in measuring radiation exposure for a person's whole body. Participants explore the implications of using a small ionization chamber in varying radiation environments, considering factors such as uniformity of the radiation field and the dosimeter's placement on the body.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that pocket dosimeters provide a "representative exposure" based on the assumption of a uniform radiation field, which may not accurately reflect the total dose received by the wearer.
  • Others argue that the small area of the dosimeter compared to the whole body could lead to discrepancies in the recorded dose, which might later be adjusted based on personal metrics like height and BMI.
  • A participant notes that the dosimeter's placement near vital organs could influence its readings, as different organs have varying susceptibility to radiation.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of dosimetry in different working environments, suggesting that activities such as walking through a plant may yield different exposure levels compared to more hazardous tasks.
  • A historical perspective is provided on manual inspection tasks in steam generators, highlighting the high radiation exposure associated with such activities and the evolution of technology in dosimetry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of pocket dosimeters in representing whole-body exposure, with multiple competing views on the factors affecting their reliability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which dosimeter readings can be considered accurate for total body exposure.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about uniform radiation fields, the dependence of dosimeter readings on placement, and the need for adjustments based on individual characteristics. The discussion also reflects on the evolution of dosimetry practices over time.

Salman Khan
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
Pocket dosimeter consists of a small ionization chamber, if a person having pocket dosimeter moving in a radiation environment, how the dose received by the man is equivalent to the dose showing on pocket dosimeter although the exposed area of a man is quite larger than the dosimeter ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The dosimeter measurements are intended to be a "representative exposure". A presumption is made that the radiative field is uniform and that the dosimeter exposure will be proportional to the exposure of the person wearing it. In situations where the field is often not uniform, more than one dosimeter can be distributed on you - for example, in you shirt pocket, right and left wrist, whatever.

Generally, these dosimeters (or the results from them) are forwarded to a lab for interpretation. Commonly, the lab will know your age, height, BMI, and the type of radiation present in your work environment. So, if appropriate, they have the option of adjusting their report on the severity of the exposure to your size.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, Alex A, berkeman and 2 others
Ok the thing which I got from your answere is, if the field is suppose to be a uniform then the dose recorded on let say a pocket dosimeter wearing by the worker will be not equal to the total actual dose received by the worker, due to the the small area of dosimeter as compare to the whole body of the worker, which wll be later on calculated according to his height bmi etc. Please correct if I got wrong. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: .Scott
Salman Khan said:
Ok the thing which I got from your answere is, if the field is suppose to be a uniform then the dose recorded on let say a pocket dosimeter wearing by the worker will be not equal to the total actual dose received by the worker, due to the the small area of dosimeter as compare to the whole body of the worker, which wll be later on calculated according to his height bmi etc. Please correct if I got wrong. Thanks
Yes. But I would add that a "pocket dosimeter" is intended for your shirt pocket - in proximity to you vital organs. Not all human organs are created equally susceptible to radiation.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alex A and Salman Khan
To be reliable, dosimetry and associated calculations have to be appropriate to the work and working environment. Walking thru the plant is not the same as jumping steam generators.
 
gmax137 said:
not the same as jumping steam generators.
I hesitate to ask, but what is involved in that activity...?
 
In the old days, PWR steam generator tube inspection required someone to manually place the Eddy current probe in each tube, which meant you had to "jump" into the primary side plenum. The shine from the tube sheet was such that you got quarterly dose in something like 60 seconds. So we engineers trained to do this, leaving the outage tasks requiring more skill to the guys who did that stuff full time. Nowadays they have robots to move the probe from tube to tube, so it is an obsolete task.

They put dosimeters on our heads, being closer to the tubesheet.
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Alex A
gmax137 said:
The shine from the tube sheet was such that you got quarterly dose in something like 60 seconds.
Holy crap. Glad you are still with us.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K