Dot product and basis vectors in a Euclidean Space

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product within an arbitrary Euclidean space. It clarifies that the dot product, defined by its properties, is independent of the basis used, allowing for the definition of an inner product in any vector space. The inner product can be used to derive a norm, where the squared length of a vector is given by the dot product of the vector with itself. The conversation also touches on the implications of using non-unit basis vectors and the role of a positive definite, symmetric matrix in defining the inner product. Overall, the principles discussed enable geometric interpretations in various vector spaces.
Mathematicsresear
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematicsresear said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
No, it is independent of a basis. You can define an inner product (dot product, scalar product) by it's properties alone. Of course, if given a certain vector space, you have to decide somehow whether such a product exists. But you can also just say: Given a vector space with an inner product. Then ... , in which case you won't have to bother whether such a vector space exists or not. The inner product, i.e. if not degenerate and positive definite, defines a norm by ##a \cdot a = (a,a)=|a|^2## which is commonly used as its length (squared). You can also define angles with the help of an inner product. Together this means that we can do geometry in such spaces.
 
fresh_42 said:
No, it is independent of a basis. You can define an inner product (dot product, scalar product) by it's properties alone. Of course, if given a certain vector space, you have to decide somehow whether such a product exists. But you can also just say: Given a vector space with an inner product. Then ... , in which case you won't have to bother whether such a vector space exists or not. The inner product, i.e. if not degenerate and positive definite, defines a norm by ##a \cdot a = (a,a)=|a|^2## which is commonly used as its length (squared). You can also define angles with the help of an inner product. Together this means that we can do geometry in such spaces.
What about if I wanted to write an expression for the length of a vector a, given that the basis vectors are not of unit length, how would I proceed?
 
Mathematicsresear said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
I think you can answer that question. What is the length of a vector ##\vec V_1 = (r,\theta)## in polar coordinates? Would applying a dot product to ##(r,\theta)## give you that length?
Do cartesian coordinates need to be stated in terms of standard basis vectors? Suppose you started with a vector ##\vec V_2 = x\vec i + y\vec j + z\vec k## and stated it in terms of an arbitrary basis by applying a linear transformation ##A## to get ##\vec V_3 = A \vec V_2##. Under what conditions would ##\vec V_2 \cdot \vec V_2 = \vec V_3 \cdot \vec V_3##? What does that tell you about the transformation matrix ##A##, and the new basis?
 
Mathematicsresear said:
What about if I wanted to write an expression for the length of a vector a, given that the basis vectors are not of unit length, how would I proceed?
In general you have a positive definite, symmetric matrix ##A## and an inner product ##v\cdot w := v^\tau A w##. Now you can do whatever you want to your basis. The matrix ##A## needs one, as well as the vectors if you want to set up calculations. Without them, that's all which is needed. Note that ##A## is not necessary the identity matrix as in the standard inner product in ##\mathbb{R}^n\,!##
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K