Dot Product Differentiation question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of unit vectors, specifically the concept of differentiating one unit vector with respect to another. Participants explore the implications of this differentiation, its mathematical validity, and its physical meaning.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that differentiating two unit vectors could yield the dot product between them, interpreted as the cosine of the angle between the vectors.
  • Another participant argues that differentiating one vector with respect to another is nonsensical without a function, emphasizing the need for a vector-valued function for differentiation.
  • A different viewpoint proposes that treating the first unit vector as a vector with direction and magnitude allows for a directional derivative interpretation, leading to a result that aligns with the dot product of the two unit vectors.
  • However, this interpretation is challenged, with a participant stating that the explanation provided does not accurately represent the concept of a directional derivative and reiterating the necessity of differentiating a vector function.
  • A later reply indicates a participant's agreement with the critique and expresses a need to reconsider their original question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on the validity of differentiating one vector with respect to another, with some asserting that it requires a function, while others explore the implications of such differentiation. No consensus is reached on the original question or the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the differentiation of vectors, particularly the dependence on definitions of vector functions and the conditions under which differentiation is valid.

n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
If I differentiate two unit vectors, one with respect to the other, would it just be the dot product between the two vectors (namely the cosine of the angle between them)?

I don't understand the physical meaning of the result...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean, given [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{u}[/itex], differentiate one with respect to the other? That makes no more sense than differentiating one number with respect to another- you have to differentiate a function. If [itex]\vec{f}(\vec{v})[/itex] is a vector valued function of the vector [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] then you could differentiate [itex]\vec{f}[/itex] with respect to [itex]\vec{v}[/itex]. If [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] is in Rn and [itex]\vec{f}(\vec{v})[/itex] is in Rm then the derivative would be a linear transformation from Rn to Rm, representable by an n by m matrix.
 
If you treat the first unit vector as just a vector with a given direction and magnitude of 1, then differentiating it with respect to the other unit vector really means how it's magnitude changes if you add 1 but in a different direction. This is equivalent to a so called directional derivative (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DirectionalDerivative.html, (6)). In this extreme case you differentiate the first vector by its own unit vector, which becomes 1. then dot product the result with the second unit vector. And yes, it becomes the dot product of the two unit vectors, namely the cosine of their angles.
 
ylo010 said:
If you treat the first unit vector as just a vector with a given direction and magnitude of 1, then differentiating it with respect to the other unit vector really means how it's magnitude changes if you add 1 but in a different direction. This is equivalent to a so called directional derivative (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DirectionalDerivative.html, (6)). In this extreme case you differentiate the first vector by its own unit vector, which becomes 1. then dot product the result with the second unit vector. And yes, it becomes the dot product of the two unit vectors, namely the cosine of their angles.
No. "How its magnitude changes if you add 1 but in a different direction" is NOT the directional derivative. The wolfram site you give makes it very clear, as I said before, that you cannot differentiate a "vector", you must differentiate a "vector function".

It is true that if f(x,y,z) (f is a numerical valued function, not a vector function) and [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] a given vector, then "the derivative of f in the direction of [itex]\vec{v}[/itex]" is
[tex]\frac{\grad f\cdot\vec{v}}{|\vec{v}|}[/tex]

But that has nothing to do with "differentiating one vector by another".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to agree with HallsofIvy here... I think I need to re-look what my question is.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K