Dot product of vector and a dyadic.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the dot product of a vector and a dyadic, specifically the expression \( a \bullet 2M \bullet b \) where \( a = i - 2j + 2k \), \( b = 4i - 3j \), and \( M = 3ii + 2ij - ji + kj \). The participants clarify that the dot product can be computed even when the vectors involved differ in size, emphasizing the importance of understanding the definition of the dot product and its application to dyadics. The final result involves representing \( 2M \) as a matrix and performing matrix multiplication to achieve the desired product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically dot products.
  • Familiarity with dyadics and their representation in vector calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of matrix multiplication and representation of vectors as matrices.
  • Proficiency in using unit vectors in calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dyadics in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the matrix representation of vectors and dyadics.
  • Explore advanced applications of the dot product in physics and engineering.
  • Review linear algebra concepts related to matrix multiplication and vector spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector operations and dyadic products.

htdIO
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Question
If a = i - 2j + 2k
b = 4i - 3j
M = 3ii + 2ij - ji + kj. M is a dyadic.
Determine a\bullet2M\bulletb


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This isn't really homework, but rather just some self study to help me understand some of my work better. Attached is the answer.

My real question in this case is some info on how the dot product works? Been trying to find some info about this for 2 days now. If someone could just help explain the dot product between a and 2M, I would be really greatful.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • answer.jpg
    answer.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 1,434
Physics news on Phys.org
If that is self-study, then surely the book(s) you use should explain the dot product before giving you examples of this kind? What exactly do you not understand in your books?
 
No, the book we use makes the assumption that we know how to calculate the dot product and only introduces dyadics.

I know how to calculate the dot product of 2 vectors if they were something like this:

(4i + 2j) (dot) (i + j) = 4+2 = 6.

But those vectors are of the same size. How do you go about it in the example, where the vector sizes differ?
 
One vector is 4i+2j and the other is i+j right? Then those two vectors are not the same size. (And when I say 'size', I mean inner product).
 
When you multiply 2M on the left by a, you deal with the unit vectors on the left in each term of the dyad. Similarly, when you multiply on the right by b, you deal with the unit vectors on the right. That's all there is to it.
 
htdIO said:
No, the book we use makes the assumption that we know how to calculate the dot product and only introduces dyadics.

I know how to calculate the dot product of 2 vectors if they were something like this:

(4i + 2j) (dot) (i + j) = 4+2 = 6.

But those vectors are of the same size. How do you go about it in the example, where the vector sizes differ?

It is a rather strange book that you have. If it introduces something, it should explain how that something works. For a dyad \textbf{ab} and a vector \textbf{c}: \textbf{c} \cdot \textbf{ab} = (\textbf{c} \cdot \textbf{a})\textbf{b}\textbf{ab} \cdot \textbf{c}= \textbf{a}(\textbf{b} \cdot \textbf{c})
 
It is a bit frustrating.

Thanks for all the answers, I've realized my mistake.

I somehow messed forgot the right definition for dot product. Just grabbed some old books and everything seems to work out now.

Sorry and thanks again for all the help.
 
Of course, 2M= 6ii + 4ij - 2ji + 4kj which can be represented as the matrix
\begin{bmatrix}6 & 4 & 0 \\ -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 & 0\end{bmatrix}

Your product is the same as the matrix product
\begin{bmatrix}1 & -2 & 2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}6 & 4 & 0 \\ -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 & 0\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}4\\ -3 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K