Double-slit experiment and watching the electrons

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of "watching" electrons in the double-slit experiment, particularly how the choice of light wavelength affects interference patterns. It is suggested that using a long wavelength light source can obscure which-path information, potentially allowing for interference to persist even when electrons are observed. The interaction between photons and electrons is crucial; if the interaction provides reliable which-path information, interference is lost, while unreliable information may still allow some interference. Participants also explore whether experiments have been conducted with strong light sources of varying wavelengths and the outcomes of such setups. The conversation highlights the complexity of quantum mechanics and the need for precise conditions to observe interference patterns.
  • #31
Do you know if S M TAN is Shina Tan? He looks very young.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
naima said:
Do you know if S M TAN is Shina Tan?

No. S M Tan is Sze Meng Tan.
 
  • #33
thank you.
There is a 3/2 factor in the visibility formula. From which identity does it come?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
We begin with an integral from zero to pi of a function of the angle \theta.
Using x = cos (\theta.) visibility of the fringes becomes
A\int_{-1}^1 (1+x^2) e^{i u x} dx.
Integrating it twice by parts we get
4A [\frac{sin u}{u}+\frac{cos u}{u^2}-\frac{sin u}{u^3}].
"u" being the distance of slits divided by the wavelength of the photon when it decreases to zero the limit of visibility must be 1. We need so a normalization factor and the good formula is
3/2 [\frac{sin u}{u}+\frac{cos u}{u^2}-\frac{sin u}{u^3}].

We can compute the visibility when u = 1. It is when we watch the electrons with light having for wavelength the distance
between the slits. We have V(1) = 3/2 cos(1) = 0.8
So the visibility is still very good!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
568
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K