Double-slit experiment with radio towers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of radio waves emitted by two shortwave radio antennas positioned 352.0 m apart. The car, traveling 124.0 m north from the midpoint of the antennas, first encounters a minimum in reception. The initial calculation using the formula for dark fringes in a two-slit interference pattern yielded an incorrect wavelength of 186.25 m. The correct approach requires considering the path length difference and utilizing the original formulation for destructive interference, as the distance between the antennas is not negligible compared to the distance to the receiver.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of two-slit interference and dark fringes
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of wave properties, specifically wavelength and frequency
  • Ability to apply path length difference concepts in wave interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the path length difference formula for wave interference
  • Learn about the conditions for constructive and destructive interference in wave phenomena
  • Explore practical applications of radio wave interference in telecommunications
  • Investigate the impact of antenna spacing on signal reception and interference patterns
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly in wave mechanics, engineers working with radio frequency technologies, and anyone interested in the principles of interference and signal processing.

gigli
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two shortwave radio antennas broadcast identical, in-phase signals at the same frequency. The transmitters are 176.0 m north, and 176.0 m south of Western Ave, respectively, as shown (that is, they are separated by 352.0 m). Western Ave is 452.0 m long. Starting at the end of that avenue, a car drives north along Negundo Street, which lies parallel to the line joining the two radio antennas. The car first encounters a minimum in reception after it travels 124.0 m. What is the wavelength of the radio waves? Assume that the car and the transmitters are all at the same altitude.

http://www.instantimagehosting.com/storage/Untitled_6.jpg

Homework Equations


2-slit interference for dark fringes (minimums)
sin\theta=[(m+.5)\lambda]/d



The Attempt at a Solution


First encounters a minimum of reception means the first dark spot from the midpoint. Therefore m, the fringe number=0.
Solving for the angle of separation between the first dark spot at 124m and the midpoint. We have two sides of a triangle so arctan(124/452)= 15.3408908 degrees

sin(15.3408908)=[(.5)\lambda]/352
2*sin(15.3408908)*352=\lambda=186.251202 m

However this is incorrect! Any help you can give me would be excellent!




http://www.instantimagehosting.com/storage/Untitled_6.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
gigli said:

Homework Statement


Two shortwave radio antennas broadcast identical, in-phase signals at the same frequency. The transmitters are 176.0 m north, and 176.0 m south of Western Ave, respectively, as shown (that is, they are separated by 352.0 m). Western Ave is 452.0 m long. Starting at the end of that avenue, a car drives north along Negundo Street, which lies parallel to the line joining the two radio antennas. The car first encounters a minimum in reception after it travels 124.0 m. What is the wavelength of the radio waves? Assume that the car and the transmitters are all at the same altitude.

http://www.instantimagehosting.com/storage/Untitled_6.jpg

Homework Equations


2-slit interference for dark fringes (minimums)
sin\theta=[(m+.5)\lambda]/d



The Attempt at a Solution


First encounters a minimum of reception means the first dark spot from the midpoint. Therefore m, the fringe number=0.
Solving for the angle of separation between the first dark spot at 124m and the midpoint. We have two sides of a triangle so arctan(124/452)= 15.3408908 degrees

sin(15.3408908)=[(.5)\lambda]/352
2*sin(15.3408908)*352=\lambda=186.251202 m

However this is incorrect! Any help you can give me would be excellent!




http://www.instantimagehosting.com/storage/Untitled_6.jpg

The condition for destructive interference here is that the path length difference be related to the wavelength by:

<br /> \Delta L= \left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda<br />
where \Delta L=L_1-L_2. So on the left hand side you find the distance from one source to the receiver, find the distance from the other source to the receiver, and then find the difference between those two paths.

In cases where the distance between the sources is much smaller than the distance to the receiver (like in Young's experiment), there is an approximation that can be used:

<br /> \Delta L = d \sin\theta<br />

This is what you were using; however, for this to be valid, you would need the distance between the transmitters to be much smaller than the length of Western Avenue. Since this is not the case, I believe you would need to use the original formulation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K