Double slit with time measurement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the implications of time measurement in a double-slit experiment setup, specifically using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer configuration. Participants debate the coherence time of light sources, particularly continuous wave (cw) versus pulsed single photons, and its effect on interference patterns. Key points include the assertion that if the time difference between paths exceeds the coherence time, interference will not occur, as established by the uncertainty principle (ΔE x ΔT > ħ/2). The discussion emphasizes the necessity of indistinguishable pathways for interference to manifest.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the uncertainty principle.
  • Familiarity with Mach-Zehnder interferometer setups.
  • Knowledge of coherence time and its implications for light sources.
  • Basic grasp of Feynman path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of coherence time in quantum optics experiments.
  • Study the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect and its relevance to photon interference.
  • Explore Feynman's path integral formulation in greater detail.
  • Investigate experimental setups that utilize pulsed versus continuous wave light sources for interference studies.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum optics seeking to deepen their understanding of interference phenomena and the role of coherence in photon behavior.

  • #61
DParlevliet said:
The experiment above is about the same as a double slit.

No, it is clearly not. A double slit measures spatial coherence. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer measures temporal coherence. These are two different quantities which are not "about the same".

DParlevliet said:
A spatial detector which can show waves.

And what is that supposed to be? I do not think this thread is going anywhere and you do not seem to be willing to understand the things in detail or read up on them, so I am afraid this is getting pointless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Cthugha said:
No, it is clearly not. A double slit measures spatial coherence. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer measures temporal coherence. These are two different quantities which are not "about the same".
If a single photon from the sun goes through a double slit, then the coherence time of each wave, going through each slit, is in the femtosecond range?
 
  • #63
It does not matter what you do to it. Unless you filter the light spectrally, you always get a coherence time of maybe 100 femtoseconds or something like that for light from the sun.

Whether you will see an interference pattern or not still depends on spatial coherence, though. So for example it matters strongly, whether you place a pinhole to filter the light.
 
  • #64
Cthugha said:
It does not matter what you do to it. Unless you filter the light spectrally, you always get a coherence time of maybe 100 femtoseconds or something like that for light from the sun.

Whether you will see an interference pattern or not still depends on spatial coherence, though. So for example it matters strongly, whether you place a pinhole to filter the light.

I would give up, the fact you haven't though strongly indicates your patience, so kudos. :smile:
 
  • #65
DParlevliet said:
If a single photon from the sun goes through a double slit, then the coherence time of each wave, going through each slit, is in the femtosecond range?

It's in the Planck range actually but meh...
 
  • #66
Cthugha said:
It does not matter what you do to it. Unless you filter the light spectrally, you always get a coherence time of maybe 100 femtoseconds or something like that for light from the sun.
Of course a spectral filter is needed because one needs monochromatic light. It must be as much as possible be comparable with single photons, so not broad bandwith. Does that matter much?
 
  • #67
DParlevliet said:
Of course a spectral filter is needed because one needs monochromatic light. It must be as much as possible be comparable with single photons, so not broad bandwith. Does that matter much?

Eh? Single photons are Fock states with a fixed photon number of 1. That is all there is. They do not have to be monochromatic. They often are far from that in reality. Sorry, but Bone234 seems to be right. This discussion seems entirely pointless.
 
  • #68
closed for moderation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
511
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K