Doubling I, what happens to v_d and n?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the effects of applying an electric field to a conductor, specifically examining the relationship between current density (##\vec J = \sigma \vec E##), drift velocity (##v_d##), and electron density (##n##). It concludes that when the current density is doubled, the number of electrons responding to the electric field also doubles, resulting in a corresponding doubling of the drift velocity (##v_d##). The total number of free electrons remains constant, but the increased number of electrons affected by the electric field leads to a linear perturbation effect on the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and current density in conductors
  • Familiarity with electron behavior in metals, particularly Fermi energy concepts
  • Knowledge of the Drude model and its limitations in describing electron dynamics
  • Basic grasp of solid-state physics and electron transport phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Drude model versus modern electron transport theories
  • Explore the concept of Fermi surface shifts and their impact on electrical conduction
  • Investigate the linear response theory in the context of electric fields applied to conductors
  • Learn about perturbation theory and its applications in solid-state physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying solid-state physics or materials science, particularly those interested in electron transport and conductivity in metals.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283
I am wondering (again) what's going on when we apply an electric field to a conductor. In particular if we apply an electric field that creates a current density ##\vec J = \sigma \vec E## (I'm neglecting thermoelectric effects), there is a certain number of electrons (of the order of ##v_d / v_F## per 1 free electron, i.e. about one in ten billion for a reasonable experimental setup) that are affected by the ##\vec E## field, and they move with speeds near ##v_F##. Yes, this is in stark contrast to the obsolete Drude's model where every single free electron is affected by the ##\vec E## field and move in average with a velocity of ##v_d##. But I do this on purpose, hence the graduate level prefix of this thread.
More precisely, ##J = e \left ( \frac{nv_d}{v_F} \right )v_F##, where the quantity in parenthesis denotes the number of electrons that is affected by the ##\vec E## field and which moves with speeds at about ##v_F##.

So, this suggest that if we double the current density, since ##v_F## won't be affected, either ##n## (the free electron density number), ##v_d## or both will be affected. At first I thought that the drift velocity would double, meaning that the number of electrons that participate in electrical conduction stays constant when we double the current. But then I thought that the apparent shift of the Fermi sphere is greater when we double the current, so the number of electrons taking part in electrical conduction is impacted by the doubling of current.

So what's going on when we double the current in an idealized (perfectly spherical Fermi surface) metallic conductor? Is the number of electrons that respond to the field doubled, or their velocity doubled, or a mix of both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume density of the free electrons, n, is given and cannot be changed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fluidistic
Lord Jestocost said:
The volume density of the free electrons, n, is given and cannot be changed.
Ah right, that makes sense. This means ##v_d## is doubled. I missed the fact that a displacement of the Fermi sphere can be done by modifying ##v_d## and does not necessarily involve a different number of electrons that reacted to the applied field.Edit: Nevermind. I finally get it. The number of electrons that react to the applied E field DOES double. This means ##v_d## doubles too. The total number of free electrons remains unchanged though. It's just the number of electrons affected by the E field that increases, and it makes sense because the E field acts like a small perturbation whose effect on the system is linear.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
562