Doubt about NMOS Transistor in Microcap: Varunag

  • Thread starter Thread starter varunag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Mosfet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on modeling an NMOS transistor in Microcap, where the user, Varunag, encountered negative current when varying the body-source voltage (V_{BS}). The issue arises from reverse biasing the body-source and body-drain junctions due to the applied body voltage, which alters the transistor's operation. It is concluded that the first-order model in Microcap is insufficient for accurate simulation, necessitating the use of higher-order models to account for the body effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NMOS transistor operation and biasing
  • Familiarity with Microcap simulation software
  • Knowledge of MOSFET body effect and its implications
  • Basic circuit design principles involving MOSFETs
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced NMOS transistor modeling techniques in Microcap
  • Learn about the body effect in MOSFETs and its impact on performance
  • Investigate higher-order models for accurate circuit simulations
  • Review the Microcap documentation, specifically the section on body effect (page 484 of the provided link)
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students working with NMOS transistors and Microcap software, particularly those interested in accurate modeling and simulation of semiconductor devices.

varunag
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was making a model of a NMOS transistor in Microcap. It was part of an assignment. I was supposed to make graph with changing value of V_{BS}. But after a certain value of V_{BS}, I got negative current. It came to my mind it is not possible. But, I couldn't think of a reason instantly, as to why current can't flow in the opposite direction.
Here V_D = 2.5V, V_G = 1.5V, source is grounded and V_B = 4V. I hope that a reasoning could be given without other parameters of the transistor, yet if other parameters are required I would give them.

I myself will look about this and share it with everyone.

-varunag
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's fairly unclear what your test circuit looks like, but, yeah, a MOSFET will conduct equally well between drain and source, in either direction--according to bias.
 
I found the problem with the design. When we give positive supply to the body, we are making the body-source junction reverse bias.(I have not mentioned in my query that source is grounded, but I suppose that could be expected by the way I had given the values)
And on further increasing the body voltage, we make the body-drain junction reverse bias as well. Making these junctions reverse bias, we are changing the way the transistor works. I could only figure out this.

I hope someone could give a reason more suitable.

-varunag
 
Not all mosfets are four terminal. Most commercial decretes are three terminal.
I don't know what "negative current" means.
 
Phrak said:
Not all mosfets are four terminal. Most commercial decretes are three terminal.
I don't know what "negative current" means.

Well we know 4 terminal mosfets. And we usually short the body with the source. only this time we tried to give some voltage to the body, to check the theoretical relations we have. It seems the first order model used by "Microcap" software, is inadequate to deal with this, and we need to check with higher models.
 
varunag said:
Well we know 4 terminal mosfets. And we usually short the body with the source. only this time we tried to give some voltage to the body, to check the theoretical relations we have. It seems the first order model used by "Microcap" software, is inadequate to deal with this, and we need to check with higher models.

Not if MicroCap can be used for a circuit simulation with body effect considered. And that is described very briefly here: http://www.zenex.fi/microcap/files/9rm.pdf , on page 484. So there's probably a small glitch with your model.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K