Doubt regarding View factor/shape factor of infinite inclined plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter harsh_23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the view factor, specifically $$f_{ij}$$, for an infinite inclined plate. The key conclusion is that $$f_{ij} = 1 - \sin(\alpha/2)$$, derived from the reciprocity theorem and symmetry considerations. The participants debate the assumption that radiation only travels through the gap between the plates, questioning whether radiation also escapes to the surrounding environment. The validity of the original question is affirmed, despite concerns about radiation self-interaction and surrounding emissions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of view factors in radiative heat transfer
  • Familiarity with the reciprocity theorem in radiation
  • Knowledge of geometric considerations in radiation exchange
  • Basic principles of thermal radiation and emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the reciprocity theorem in detail and its applications in radiative heat transfer
  • Explore advanced topics in view factor calculations for complex geometries
  • Investigate the effects of surrounding environments on radiation exchange
  • Learn about the implications of self-radiation in thermal systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermal engineering, particularly those focusing on radiative heat transfer and view factor calculations in complex geometries.

harsh_23
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We need to prove that fraction of total radiation from plate i falling on plate j is equal to 1-sin(α/2) where both plates are infinite long, share a common edge , have same width and are inclined at an angle α
Relevant Equations
in general fab represent fraction of total radiation from a falling on b

so sum of all fai =1
1000006565.jpg

The figure is infinite out and in the page.

We need to find $$f_{ij}$$ means if $$I$$ is the total radiation plate i is emitting then $$f_{ij}$$ represent fraction of total radiation Falling on plate $$j$$ from plate $$i$$

$$So in general fab represent fraction of total radiation from a falling on b$$
$$so \ sum \ of \ all\ fai =1$$
So in the above image I want to prove why $$f_{ij} = 1-sin(α/2)$$

First thing I have observed in others proofs that they consider radiation going to the surrounding through the gap between the plates and they consider the gap as an imaginary surface let's call $$k$$ with width l




Now we can see that side l is simply $$2w×sin(α/2)$$

Also $$f_{ki}=f_{kj}=1/2$$
(by symmetry)(means 1/2 of $$k$$ radiation is going to plate $j$ and other to I)

Then by reciprocity theorem

(It's a general theorem in radiation)
1000014200.jpg

(It states that $$A_a×f_{ab}=A_b×f_{ba}$$ (here $$A$$ represent area))

$$A_i×f_{ik}=A_k×f_{ki}$$ (now area of plates is proportional to width)

$$W×f_{ik}=2wsin(α/2)×1/2$$

$$f_{ik}=sin(α/2)$$

And $$f_{ik}+f_{ij}=1$$

So $$f_{ij}=1-sin(α/2)$$

Now my doubt is that radiation shouldn't only be going through the gap but also to the surrounding

1000014202.jpg


So $$f_{ik}+f_{ij}≠1$$

If I call surrounding s then

$$f_{ik}+f_{ij}+f_{is}=1$$

And should be same for all

And even if I don't consider the radiation to surrounding then considering the gap be bit spherical (concave) then some radiation should go to itself so saying

$$f_{ki}=f_{kj}=1/2$$ should be false as some of the total radiation is going to itself.

So someone pls help Clearing My doubt...
 

Attachments

  • 1000006566.jpg
    1000006566.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 72
  • 1000006567.jpg
    1000006567.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
harsh_23 said:
Now my doubt is that radiation shouldn't only be going through the gap but also to the surrounding
I think you are supposed to take all the radiation as coming from the side facing the other plate, so it must either go to the other plate or to the gap.
harsh_23 said:
considering the gap be bit spherical (concave) then some radiation should go to itself
But then you cannot apply the reciprocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harsh_23
So is there a way by which radiation outside to surrounding can be blocked for the question to be valid?
 
harsh_23 said:
So is there a way by which radiation outside to surrounding can be blocked for the question to be valid?
Sorry, I do not understand your question. The question posed as homework in post #1 is valid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K