Programs Doubts about a master degree after Computer Engineering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing a master's program in electronics engineering, particularly the new Space Communications and Sensing curriculum. Participants emphasize that while electronics engineers can work in space technologies, those roles often require a strong background in physics or astronomy. Concerns are raised about the lack of course details for the new program, suggesting that a more established path like Photonics or MicroElectronics may offer better career opportunities. It is advised to clarify the specifics of the curriculum with faculty before making a decision. Ultimately, the importance of selecting a program that aligns with personal interests and career goals is highlighted.
nebbione
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, this year i'll get my Bachelor Degree in Computer Engineering, i have some doubts about the master course to get; actually my university offers these courses in accordance with my Bachelor Degree: (i'll write only those who catched my interest)

- Computer Engineering : Industrial Automation
- Electronics Engineering : Space Communications and Sensing
- Electronics Engineering : Photonics
- Electronics Engineering : MicroElectronics

I really like electronics, and physics, but even astronomy and space-related things, so i was thinking about the Space communications and Sensing curriculum, but since this curriculum is new and still no list of courses is available (it was introduced this year) I wanted to ask some information about this career.

My doubts are :

1) Does this course prepares "Electronics Engineers for Space Technologies" ?
2) Can I write on curriculum "Space Technologies Engineer" or "Space Engineer" for job opportunities ?
3) Is a remote sensing expert a physicist ?


Thanks and Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I have done some work for space-based systems, and in my experience all the electronics engineers involved have standard electronics engineering backgrounds. The scientists specialized in astronomy or physics. It's very difficult to evaluate a program without a course list but beware of learning a little about a lot... much better in a master's course to learn a lot about a little.

2. I don't understand this question.

3. I imagine there is a strong need for physicists, engineers, geologists, mathematicians, and more in a remote sensing activity.
 
While "Space Communications and Sensing" sounds cool, I would say the safest choice career wise is either Photonics or MicroElectronics.

That being said I have no idea what the program is that they're providing you, but I would imagine the photonics stream would be somewhat similar to the Space Communications and sensing stream though the photonics stream would provide more opportunities at the end of your degree. These opportunities include many astronomical applications such as photonic chips and things like that which will significantly effect the design of telescopes and the mechanisms in which they work.

Sticking with the photonics degree would provide you a lot more opportunities at the end of the degree compared to the other choices.

If you are developing new remote sensing techniques then I guess that falls under being a physicist.

As far as what you can write on your CV, you would have to write exactly what the course says, "Space Communications Engineer".

I hope it's not too late and you are still deciding, you should really go and talk to all of the academics involved to get them to spell out the differences between each degree.

The last thing you want is to get stuck in a degree you hate because there was no information provided.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top