Drop test of an object, are my physics right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of drop testing an object with a complex geometry using a free-falling rig. The user analyzes the energy equations for free fall and the effects of friction on the velocity of the rig-object system. Key points include the realization that while mass does not affect the velocity in free fall, it does influence the energy at impact, which is crucial for understanding the force of impact. Additionally, the impact dynamics may change due to the rig's configuration, affecting the moment of inertia and deceleration rates. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of considering various factors when evaluating the object's performance during impact testing.
dt00073
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I will keep this short and sweet.

I am drop testing an object of complicated geometry froma set height in 10 different orientations.
Due to the complexity I decided to make a free falling rig where it slides (via roller bearings for example) when released.

Simple freefall analysis using energy equation from dropping it at a set height h:

mgh=1/2m(v^2)

v = √2gh


Falling attached on the rig:

Mgh - Fh = 1/2M(v^2)

where M is mass including the attachment and arm. and -Fh is friction energy lost from the bearing rolling/sliding down the rig. (i want to keep it within 2% of freefall velocity so will need to find a coefficent of friction which allows this)


However we can see the mass doesn't effect the velocity, doesn't the mass change the force/energy it hits the ground with?

Hence:

mgh(freefall) = mgh(rig)

So solving for the height will give me the height at which the object will hit the floor with the same energy/force.

Is this right?

Due to terminal velocity, would I need to solve for this as well ?


Thanks.

I have attached a diagram to help.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
When you attach the rig to the object you are no longer drop-testing the object, you are drop-testing the rig-object system.

Stand on the desk. Jump off. That wasn't too bad was it? Now try it with a load strapped to your back.
 
I know that hence why I said where the Mass of the 2nd equation is the mass of the object AND rig and that friction must be included.

You didn't answer my question at all.
 
Even if you eliminate the friction, the velocity will be the same but energy will not. The energy depends on the mass.
So the body on the rig will have more energy at the impact, assuming zero friction.
The force of impact is harder to estimate. The rig may change the impact time so the force will change in a quite unpredictable way.
 
dt00073 said:
You didn't answer my question at all.
That's because I am trying to help you and the answer to your question won't help you.

If you are interested in how the object performs when receiving an impact of a certain energy from a certain direction then the best way to control and measure this is to hold the object still and drop a weight onto it.

If you are interested in how the object performs in the real world when dropped from a certain height you need to bear in mind that this depends on a number of factors including the moment of intertia of the object, the horizontal distance of the impact point from the centre of mass, the rate of deceleration etc. all of which you change by fixing the object in a rig.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top