Durabilty of sealed radioactive samples

  • Thread starter Thread starter sim0e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactive
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the durability of sealed radioactive samples, specifically focusing on how their sealed state may be compromised through handling and the implications for safety in a laboratory setting. Participants explore the longevity and safety protocols associated with various radioactive sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the duration it takes for the sealed state of radioactive samples to diminish due to handling with steel forceps, raising concerns about potential contamination in the workspace.
  • Another participant explains that radioactive sources are typically provided with a specified usage time, during which confinement is guaranteed, and mentions that sources undergo regular inspections for damage.
  • A participant notes that Am-Be neutron sources have a confinement lifetime of 10 years, after which they must be returned or re-sealed, and emphasizes the importance of training for users in case of accidents.
  • There is a question regarding the strength and type of radioactive sources, with a participant indicating that most sealed sources are relatively weak, while acknowledging that some, like Am-Be, can be dangerous.
  • A later reply identifies specific sources being discussed, including Am243, Sr90, Co60, and Cs137.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of concern regarding the durability of sealed sources and the protocols for handling them. While some agree on the importance of inspections and training, there is no consensus on the specifics of how handling affects the sealed state or the safety implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed information on the specific handling practices that may affect the sealed state and the varying characteristics of different radioactive sources that could influence their durability.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to laboratory personnel, safety officers, and students involved in handling radioactive materials or studying radiation safety protocols.

sim0e
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Having recently been engaged in a laboratory class involving the measurement of the activity of various sealed radioactive samples, I am curious to know how durable these 'sealed' disks are...

My question is, how long does it take for its 'sealed' state to become diminished through regular contact with steel forceps (moving the samples to Geiger counter) and pose a danger - i.e. spreading radioactive material around workspace area to unprotected students?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know all of the rules, but usually a radioactive source is given to a laboratory for use during a specified time, which is normally such that the confinement is guaranteed. You have a certain license time for using the source. Sources are also regularly inspected for damage.
For instance, we use Am-Be neutron sources which have a confinement lifetime of 10 years. After 10 years, they have to be handed in and they will or be considered as waste and handled as such, or will be re-sealed. They are also inspected every year to see if no mechanical damage is done to the source. Also, normally every person which is endorsed to use the source has had a training which tells him/her what to do in case he has an accident with the source which might potentially damage it (like dropping it accidentally), or when he/she notices something strange with the source. In fact, the thing to do is to seal the area as quickly as possible, to call in radiation protection, and to test everybody who might have been near the area for contamination.

I suppose that this depends on the strength and kind of source, also.
 
What kind of source? Most sealed sources are actually quite weak -- the Cs sources we use for calibration, for example, or even most Th/U/Pu disks. Obviously there are exceptions -- Am-Be neutron sources can be scary (we have several here).
 
Thanks to vanesch and CRGreathouse.

The sources were Am243, Sr90, Co60 and Cs137.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
506K