Dynamic Impossibility of Photon to Electron/Positron Conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Woodzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamic impossibility of converting a single photon into an electron and a positron in empty space. Key principles include the conservation of momentum and energy, which cannot be satisfied simultaneously in this scenario. The photon, having no rest mass, possesses energy equal to pc, complicating the transformation process. A conceptual approach using a zero momentum frame is suggested, although a calculational method is acknowledged as more tedious.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photon properties and energy-momentum relation
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in physics, specifically momentum and energy
  • Familiarity with particle physics concepts, including electron and positron characteristics
  • Basic grasp of reference frames, particularly the zero momentum frame
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of conservation of momentum and energy in particle interactions
  • Learn about the energy-momentum relation for massless particles
  • Explore the concept of zero momentum frames in physics
  • Investigate the conditions required for particle-antiparticle pair production
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of energy and momentum conservation in high-energy processes.

Woodzy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Show that the following process is dynamically impossible: A single photon in empty space is transformed into an electron and a positron.

Hint: use conservation of momentum and energy


for this problem I know a photon has no rest mass and therefore its energy is just equal to pc. However I am unsure about how o go about the proof? I am fairly comfortable obtaining expressions for momentum and energy conservation but what then??

please help

thanks

 
Physics news on Phys.org


A conceptual approach to solve this can be reached by considering what happens in a zero momentum frame.

A calculational approach is more tedious, and involves proving that it is impossible to satisfy both conservation of momentum and energy simultaneously. You could do this in the zero momentum frame, but it will be physically confusing.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K