E.Engr running out of ideas to enter the world of physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of electrical engineering (EE) and physics, particularly focusing on how an individual with a background in EE can engage more deeply with physics concepts in their career. Participants explore the feasibility of pursuing a PhD in EE with a strong emphasis on physics, specifically in areas like quantum computing and materials science, as well as the relevance of signal processing in high energy physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to integrate physics into their career in semiconductor design and seeks feedback on the viability of pursuing a PhD in EE with a focus on quantum physics.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between signal processing and high energy physics, suggesting that signal processing tools may be necessary for analyzing data in high energy experiments.
  • Some participants clarify that digital signal processing (DSP) is primarily mathematical and not directly related to physics, while others argue that signal processing is indeed relevant in high energy physics contexts.
  • A participant suggests that a strong foundation in quantum mechanics is essential for an EE pursuing a physics-related PhD, recommending physics department courses over engineering ones for a more comprehensive understanding.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for EEs to transition into materials science, with varying opinions on the ease of this transition depending on the specific area of interest within materials science.
  • Another participant highlights the overlap between physics and EE, pointing to resources that may help bridge the gap between the two fields.
  • Questions arise about the adequacy of an EE background for pursuing advanced topics in physics, such as control systems and mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the relationship between EE and physics, particularly in terms of career paths and the relevance of specific physics concepts to engineering practices. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly concerning the transition from EE to materials science and the necessary physics background for advanced studies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of the specific requirements and overlaps between EE and physics, as well as the potential challenges in transitioning between fields. There is also an acknowledgment of varying educational approaches in physics courses that may affect comprehension and application.

intrepid_atom
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Folks,
I do Logic design and verification of Multi-core chips for a living (4th year in Semiconductor/Computer HW industry). I don't have much of a background in Physics outside my high school and some Applied Physics courses that I took in BS-EE and MS-EE. I don't covet a PhD in Physics, all I want is that at least 50% of what I do for a living involves solving Physics problems. Is that even possible? I've this idea: I'll get a PhD admit in EE. Since I've Solid State Physics background from my MS, I'll do my research in Quantum Computing for which I'll need to study Quantum Physics. Bottom line: I'm working towards a PhD in EE, but under the hood its mostly Physics. Once I get my PhD in EE I could end up in a semiconductor company R&D doing research and solving problems in ...drumroll... Physics, for a living.
You can comment "Are you sure you're a Logic designer?". I know.
I must be overlooking a lot of things here. That's why I depend on you guys to expose flaws in my idea and beat the hell out of it.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have one more question on top of it. Do you know if signal processing is somehow related to high energy physics as solid state/semiconductor is more related to quantum physics?
 
hariyo,
If you're asking about digital signal processing(DSP) then no it has nothing to do with physics. DSP is all math. It involves a lot of Fourier transforms, z-transforms, time-frequency domain transformations, FIR filter, FFT design...stuff like that.
 
hi,
Ya I am aware of that as I am also from EE background. Actually what I mean is that in high energy physics most probably do we have to analyze the signal using necessary signal processing tools like FFT,DFT etc? I was just curious and I believe high energy physicst can better answer this question.
 
hariyo,
OK. I'm talking about DSP theory/DSP processor design.
 
Um is it just me or did anybody else find TC's Opening Post really hard to decipher?
 
hariyo said:
hi,
Ya I am aware of that as I am also from EE background. Actually what I mean is that in high energy physics most probably do we have to analyze the signal using necessary signal processing tools like FFT,DFT etc? I was just curious and I believe high energy physicst can better answer this question.

I'm not from High Energy, but I can tell you that yes a lot of signal and data processing is involved to high energy experiments. In such experiments also FPGAs are used to handle the processing.As for EE PhD with Physics content, quantum mechanics is definitely a must (I would strongly advise doing such a lecture in the physics dept. rather than EE, since QM for engineers lecture at some universities tend to skip certain things, giving preference to applications), but you should also consider other fields than quantum computing, working with sub 100nm devices (electrical devices, or optoelectronic) does involve a lot of physics, which can be more relevant if you want to end up in semicon. R&D department. You may want to look at http://www.nanohub.org , has some grad lectures on device modeling (see lectures by Datta, Lundstrom , Klimeck and Vasileska).
There is a focus nowadays on the so call Quantum Transport and its simulations since the older theories and models based on drift n diffusion break down.


Just an idea, you seem to have interest in physics, however learning it is one thing and working with it for life is a different thing, go for the PhD, enjoy the Physics and EE lectures, then decide with what you want to do later (the thesis topic that is).
 
Last edited:
Could an EE go on to do material sciences? Wouldn't that be a good middle ground? (curious EE undergrad)
 
clope023 said:
Could an EE go on to do material sciences? Wouldn't that be a good middle ground? (curious EE undergrad)

Not easily, but it depends on what you want to do in Materials Science.
 
  • #10
fss said:
Not easily, but it depends on what you want to do in Materials Science.

Electronic properties of materials and superconductivity?
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
I'm not going to repeat myself, but simply point to the fact that there's an important and often-overlooked area where physics and EE overlaps in a very large way:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=410271

Zz.

I've looked into this area as well, would an EE with a specialty in control and dynamic systems and some extra E&M and Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics courses do well there? Or would more specialty in physics be necessary for someone with a BS in EE?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K