E-field for a rectangle of charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field at a point P located a distance h from the center of a rectangle with length L and width W, which has a uniform charge density sigma. The context is an introductory electromagnetism course, where the use of calculus up to calculus 2 is expected, and Gauss's Law has not yet been covered. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their setup and integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the electric field using vector calculus techniques, involving angles and charge density. They express concern about the complexity of their integration and whether their setup is correct. Some participants question the use of spherical coordinates and suggest focusing on the perpendicular component of the electric field. Others propose alternative substitutions for integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach and questioning certain assumptions. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the dimensional consistency of the derived expressions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions constraints related to the course material, specifically that they are expected to solve the problem without advanced integration techniques, which may affect their approach. There is also a concern about the behavior of the electric field as the dimensions of the rectangle approach infinity.

Xelotath
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Problem is finding the E-field at a point P that is h distance from the center of a rectangle (along a line normal to its surface) with Length L and width W with a constant charge density sigma.

This is for an intro E&M class that is supposed to use up through calculus 2, and we have not yet discussed Gausses Law. So supposedly this should be able to be solved without any double or triple integration. Since I have had vector calculus I should be able to understand any help using vector calculus techniques.

Here is what I have tried so far and where I have gotten stuck.

Attached is an image of the problem.
Just in case the image doesn't work, I have set it up so that:

Theta is the angle on the surface between a point along the width at the center and point P.
Phi is the angle on the surface between a point along the length at the center and point P.

I started by saying:
dE=kdqsin(theta)sin(phi)/r^2
But dq=sigmadA and r=sqrt(W^2+L^2+h^2) and sin (theta)=h/sqrt(W^2+h^2) and sin(phi)=h/sqrt(L^2+h^2)
Thus dE=ksigmah^2dwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2)sqrt[(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)]]

From this point I have tried lots of algebraic stuff to make it easier to integrate, but I just have not been able to integrate this at all, and I am not sure if it is possible to do so. I am worried that my set up may be wrong. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-2.jpg
    Untitled-2.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 436
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Xelotath said:
dE=kdqsin(theta)sin(phi)/r^2
But dq=sigmadA and r=sqrt(W^2+L^2+h^2) and sin (theta)=h/sqrt(W^2+h^2) and sin(phi)=h/sqrt(L^2+h^2)
Thus dE=ksigmah^2dwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2)sqrt[(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)]]

Hi Xelotath! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and a squared: ² and a theta: θ and a phi: φ :smile:)

I'm finding it difficult to read what you've done … :confused:

i'm not convinced of the merits of spherical coordinates if the plate isn't a disc …

can I check … you are calculating only the component perpendicular to the rectangle? :smile:
 
Yes I am using the symmetry argument to say that the resultant E-field is only in the direction normal to the surface of the rectangle at point P, as all the other directions cancel out.

I am not using a spherical reference coordinate system. The sin(theta) and sin(phi) are to find the component of dE in the direction normal to the rectangle.

Sorry about the mess I don't know how to use these forum tools properly yet.
I think I've fixed it here.

dE=[tex]\frac{kdqsin(\theta)sin(\phi)}{r^{2}}[/tex]

but dq=[tex]\sigma[/tex]dA and r=[tex]\sqrt{(W^2+L^2+h^2)}[/tex] and sin([tex]\theta[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{W^2+h^2}}[/tex] and sin([tex]\phi[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{L^2+h^2}}[/tex]

Thus dE=[tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]h^{2}[/tex]kdwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2) [tex]\sqrt{(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)}[/tex]]

Sorry I keep trying to get that last line into a fraction using the tools, but it won't seem to work.
 
Xelotath said:
I am not using a spherical reference coordinate system. The sin(theta) and sin(phi) are to find the component of dE in the direction normal to the rectangle.

dE=[tex]\frac{kdqsin(\theta)sin(\phi)}{r^{2}}[/tex]

but dq=[tex]\sigma[/tex]dA and r=[tex]\sqrt{(W^2+L^2+h^2)}[/tex] and sin([tex]\theta[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{W^2+h^2}}[/tex] and sin([tex]\phi[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{L^2+h^2}}[/tex]

Thus dE=[tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]h^{2}[/tex]kdwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2) [tex]\sqrt{(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)}[/tex]]

Sorry I keep trying to get that last line into a fraction using the tools, but it won't seem to work.

(to do fractions, type \frac{}{} :wink:)

ah! that's much easier to read! :smile:

surely your cos for the component should just be h/√(h² + w² + l²) ?
 
So I have:
E=[tex]\int\int \frac{k\sigma h}{(L^2+W^2+h^2)^\frac{3}{2}}dwdl[/tex]
after the inner integration with bounds -w/2 to w/2 I get
E=[tex]\int \frac{2hkw\sigma}{(h^2+L^2)^\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{w^2+4}}dl[/tex]

Thus E=[tex]\frac{2kwL\sigma}{h\sqrt{(w^2+4)(L^2+h^2}}[/tex]
This still seems wrong
Because by calculations performed myself and seen in my textbook when you take the limit as both W and L approach infinite then E should go to [tex]2k\sigma[/tex] but here it is going to [tex]\frac{2k\sigma}{h}[/tex]
Any ideas? Or can you tell me if I've made some mistake.
 
Last edited:
Hi Xelotath! :smile:
Xelotath said:
E=[tex]\int \frac{2hkw\sigma}{(h^2+L^2)^\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{w^2+4}}dl[/tex]

No … dimensionally that's wrong …

how did you get it? the obvious thing is to substitute w = √(h2 + l2)sinhx or √(h2 + l2)tanx. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K