E field of a hemisperical shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nosmas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Shell
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field generated by a hemispherical shell, specifically focusing on the z component of the electric field and the reasoning behind the charge distribution on the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of slicing the shell into rings to analyze the electric field contributions, questioning the symmetry that leads to zero x and y components. There is also inquiry into the derivation of the distance to the point of interest and the calculation of charge on the ring.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the reasoning behind the charge distribution and the use of symmetry in the problem. Multiple interpretations of the distance and charge calculations are being explored, indicating an active engagement with the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with specific equations and concepts introduced in class, including the charge density and the geometry of the hemispherical shell, which may not be fully clarified in the original explanation.

nosmas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My teacher explained a problem of a hemispherical shell in class but i don't understand what he is doing.

http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/7656/naamloos27mf.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi nosmas! welcome to pf! :wink:

(he only worked out the z component, because from symmetry the x and y components must be zero)

he sliced the shell into rings because for any one ring, the z component of the field must be the same …

so if the total charge of that ring is q, then it has the same effect (on the z component) as a charge q all at one point (instead of spread out around the ring)

then he multiplied charge x 1/distance2 x cosθ
(he seems to have unnecessarily put in a lot of r's that then canceled …

i expect that's because they were in Eq 23-10)
 
Equation 23-10 is dE = k*(dQ/r^2)

What I am struggeling with is how the distance to the point of interest z = rcos(theta) and how they came up with the charge on the ring?
 
hi nosmas! :smile:
nosmas said:
What I am struggeling with is how the distance to the point of interest z = rcos(theta) and how they came up with the charge on the ring?

rcosθ is the distance from the centre to the plane of the ring

the charge is the charge density times the area,

and the area is the arc-length (rdθ) times the circumference of the ring (2πrsinθ)
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K