Earth's Atmosphere -- Is gravity the reason we have air pressure?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravity and air pressure in Earth's atmosphere, exploring whether gravity is the sole reason for the presence of air pressure and how it compares to other planets. The scope includes theoretical considerations, comparative planetary atmospheres, and the complexities of atmospheric composition and retention.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that gravity pulls the atmosphere towards the planet, contributing to air pressure, but question why other planets with gravity do not have similar atmospheric conditions.
  • It is noted that smaller planets have less gravitational pull, which may hinder their ability to retain an atmosphere.
  • Participants discuss the complexity of atmospheric conditions, suggesting that factors beyond gravity, such as gas density, temperature variations, and geomagnetic fields, also play significant roles.
  • There is mention of atmospheric escape, with specific processes identified that contribute to the loss of gases from Earth's atmosphere.
  • Some participants highlight that while gravity is necessary for an atmosphere, it is not sufficient on its own, indicating that multiple factors influence atmospheric retention.
  • The discussion includes references to historical changes in Earth's atmosphere due to biological processes, such as photosynthesis, which transformed it over billions of years.
  • There are challenges to specific claims regarding volcanic gas contributions and the nature of atmospheric components, indicating a need for clarification on these points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of gravity in explaining atmospheric conditions, with some arguing for its necessity while others emphasize additional factors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the complexity of atmospheric retention across different planets.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "proper atmosphere," the unresolved nature of certain claims about volcanic gas contributions, and the complexity of atmospheric processes that are not fully agreed upon by participants.

shiva bhargav
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
gravity pulling the atmosphere
I have read an article in Quora, where a person says that "Gravity pulls the atmosphere towards itself and that's one of the reason why our Atmosphere is still this way" and also adds that, "gravity is the reason we have air pressure in the first place. Gravity pulls on the atmosphere, compressing it, and creating pressure. " Is it true? if so, my question is even the other planets have a gravity pull yet our scientists say they don't have proper atmosphere as do we have.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
shiva bhargav said:
Summary: gravity pulling the atmosphere

I have read an article in Quora, where a person says that "Gravity pulls the atmosphere towards itself and that's one of the reason why our Atmosphere is still this way" and also adds that, "gravity is the reason we have air pressure in the first place. Gravity pulls on the atmosphere, compressing it, and creating pressure. " Is it true?
Yes.
if so, my question is even the other planets have a gravity pull yet our scientists say they don't have proper atmosphere as do we have.
Smaller planets have less gravitational pull and more trouble holding on to an atmosphere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shiva bhargav, pinball1970 and BillTre
russ_watters said:
Yes.

Smaller planets have less gravitational pull and more trouble holding on to an atmosphere.
But there are bigger planets too comoared to ours why aren't we able to detect proper atmospheric conditions there which we need
 
Our atmosphere is a derived one. It started out as poisonous. Later, small primitive single celled life (cyanobacteria or blue green algae) "invented" photosynthesis. Photosynthesis over about 2 billion years or more changed our atmosphere into one with oxygen. The atmosphere of Earth before oxygen arrived would kill most complex living things today. Like other planets.

Those primitive cells are still around today and live in shallow seas in formations called stromatolites. You can also see them in pond scum.

The time when free oxygen started to appear environment has several names, I like: Great Oxygenation Event
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event
Note that free oxygen is toxic to many kind of primitive organisms, so they have to live places where there is no free oxygen.
Examples: meromictic basins (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meromictic_lake) , or in layers of mud at the bottom of lakes or oceans with oxygenated waters, or some deep caves.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shiva bhargav, pinball1970 and BillTre
shiva bhargav said:
But there are bigger planets too comoared to ours why aren't we able to detect proper atmospheric conditions there which we need
"Proper atmospheric conditions" is a lot different than just having an atmosphere; all of the larger planets have significant atmospheres (and the gas giants can basically be said to be mostly atmosphere).

Gravity is why we have an atmosphere, but as Jim says, what makes it good for us is more complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shiva bhargav and BillTre
shiva bhargav said:
Summary: gravity pulling the atmosphere

I have read an article in Quora, where a person says that "Gravity pulls the atmosphere towards itself and that's one of the reason why our Atmosphere is still this way" and also adds that, "gravity is the reason we have air pressure in the first place. Gravity pulls on the atmosphere, compressing it, and creating pressure. " Is it true? if so, my question is even the other planets have a gravity pull yet our scientists say they don't have proper atmosphere as do we have.

Gravity is giving the weight of all the matter above your head. This is the same situation deep in the ocean, you are feeling the pressure from the water column above but this pressure depends also on the gravity (density of the water).

However, it is also related to the quantity of matter in the atmosphere. Think about Venus in regards of the Earth. So atmospheric pressure depends on the gaseous state of the matter at the planet's surface.

Furthermore, there is a relationship between the ability of a planet to retain its atmosphere, its gravity/mass and its proximity to the star.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HankDorsett, BillTre and shiva bhargav
I think that problem is more complex. Gravity plays its role in holding mass on any planet, but the density of gases, their segregation, temperature variation with altitude, geomagnetic field and proximity to any other cosmic object are also important. Starting with gravity, it is known that it differ from sea level to e.g. 2000 km altitude. Solar wind can strip planets from its atmosphere if there is no magnetic field protection. That's why Mars lost its atmosphere. On the other hands water vapors and carbon dioxide are heavy and are staying to the bottom of the atmosphere ( which is good for plants), while hydrogen and helium because are light are staying at the top, where the pressure is low, the gravity is much lower and the solar winds has powerful impact. That's why there is so little helium quantity in Earth atmosphere. I think that Earth lose every year some mass of atmosphere gases into the space, and I will like to know the amount and the composition. Still there is a balance with what happening on the Earth surface. There are intense addition of gases due to life activity, volcanoes activity (just one volcano can add gasses more than the gases added by humanity along all its existence), industrial activity, cattle growing and mainly poor waste management. The atmosphere become denser, but still lose lighter gas components in space.
 
Last edited:
Irbis said:
That's why there is so little helium quantity in Earth atmosphere. I think that Earth lose every year some mass of atmosphere gases into the space, and I will like to know the amount and the composition.

Atmosphere escape is one term for the phenomenon.

"Atmospheric escape of hydrogen on Earth is due to Jeans escape (~10 - 40%), charge exchange escape (~ 60 - 90%), and polar wind escape (~ 10 - 15%), currently losing about 3 kg/s of hydrogen.[1] The Earth additionally loses approximately 50 g/s of helium primarily through polar wind escape. Escape of other atmospheric constituents is much smaller.[1] A Japanese research team in 2017 found evidence of a small number of oxygen ions on the moon that came from the Earth.[10] "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_escape
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Irbis
Genava said:
However, it is also related to the quantity of matter in the atmosphere. Think about Venus in regards of the Earth. So atmospheric pressure depends on the gaseous state of the matter at the planet's surface.

Exactly. Another example is Mercury vs. Mars: nearly identical surface gravity, but one has an atmosphere and the other for all practical purposes does not.

The title says "the reason". There is no one reason. Gravity is necessary but not sufficient.
 
  • #10
Irbis said:
On the other hands water vapors and carbon dioxide are heavy and are staying to the bottom of the atmosphere ( which is good for plants)

In the case of water vapor, it has nothing to do with molecular weight, but this is due to the Clausius Clapeyron relation. The dependence with temperature mostly.

Moreover in the case of CO2, the concentration decreases sharply only above 80 km on Earth, so it is not "at the bottom". As Eskcanta pointed out about helium and hydrogen, this is not only due to molecular weight.

Irbis said:
volcanoes activity (just one volcano can add gasses more than the gases added by humanity along all its existence)

A single volcano?
 
  • #11
Genava said:
A single volcano?

I do not know if it is correct to say a volcano, as well as an earthquake of 13 degree magnitude on Richter scale, while there were produced by a meteor impact with Earth, and it ends a geological era. I saw some debates on this subject.
 
  • #12
@Irbis : the Richter scale is not used anymore. And a magnitude 13 (which does not exist on the new scale) earthquake is impossible on any of the smaller planets. It would require a fault the circles the Earth or Mars more than 100 times. So it has no meaning in this context. And it is not defined in the scale anyway.

Since you cannot have read this anyplace that PF requires to validate statements like yours, please refrain from making stuff up. Thank you.
 
  • #13
:biggrin: Since this thread is going astray it is time to cut off any more hot air. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
19K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
18K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K