Easy Electrodynamics Question on Field Lines

Kyle91
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Explain why the electric field is perpendicular to any conducting surfaces in static situations. Is this true in general (i.e. even for changing electric or magnetic fields)? Are there similar conditions on the direction of a magnetic field at the surface of a conductor.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to do the first bit regarding static electric fields, but I can't find anything online about changing electric fields.

Everything I do find says 'Always must be perpendicular', but their justification is that it wouldn't be static if it wasn't normal. Therefore I think it is possible to have non-perpendicular field lines at the surface provided the charges in the conductor aren't static.

I need some sort of justification for this (other than what I've said above) so if you could point me in the right direction it'd be greatly appreciated.

About the magnetic fields, from wikipedia -

"A magnetic field has no sources or sinks (Gauss's law for magnetism), so its field lines have no start or end: they can only form closed loops, or extend to infinity in both directions."​

Now the bit I'm not sure about, is it right to say that these magnetic field lines are perpendicular to the electric field lines near the surface of a conductor? In other words, they look exactly like equipotential lines. Take this (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/imgele/equiv3.gif) image for example, if I were to draw in mag field lines I could trace over the dots and put arrows in a clockwise direction, right?

I'm getting confused because I'm trying to apply the right hand rule and can't think of anything curling around a vector :S

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic field B at the surface of conductor is tangential only from the div-free condition of B, (draw a small cylinder across the surface and knowing B=0 inside the conductor tells you vertical B=0). Because they are div-free, their field line at the surface are closed loops. But there are no other restrictions on it. (They are of course perpendicular to E field, because E field is perpendicular to the surface)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top