Physics Problem: Finding Final Velocity and Distance Traveled on a Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter aerichk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a ball rolling down a 30-degree roof and determining its final velocity and distance traveled after falling off. The ball, with a mass of 0.35 kg, takes 2.55 seconds to reach the bottom of a 6.34-meter roof, and friction is disregarded. The first step involves calculating the resultant force acting on the ball, leading to an acceleration of 0.6 m/s² down the roof, resulting in a final velocity of 1.53 m/s. The next part of the problem requires determining how far the ball will travel horizontally after falling 2.51 meters to the ground. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate calculations and understanding of forces to solve the problem effectively.
aerichk
Ok, this is a two part problem.

Part I: We have a ball at the top of a roof that has a 30 degree angle at the horizontal. We let the ball roll and it takes 2.55 seconds to reach the bottom of the 6.34 meter roof. The ball weighs .35 kg. **DISREGARD ANY FRICTION** I.E friction of the ramp, wind resistance, any type of friction. The main part of this is to find the Final Velocity at the end of the 6.34 meter roof. So you have Vi(initial velocity) = 0, Vf(Final Velocity) = ?, G(gravity) = 9.8m/s^2. The ramp has a 30 degree angle at the horizontal, and it takes 2.55 seconds to get to the bottom.

Part II: After we find the Final Velocity, we have to figure out how far the ball will travel in the air. After it reaches the final velocity, it falls off the roof 2.51 meters to the ground. The *main part* of the entire problem is to figure out how far it will go off the roof. The Y axis is 2.51 meters, and we need to find out what the X axis will be. We need to find out Dx(distance of x), Vx(Velocity of x), and T(time it takes to reach the ground).

My friends and I have been having trouble with this problem all day. We keep coming up with wrong, impossible answers. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all a ball cannot weigh .35kg, it has a mass of .35kg. Thats like saying the distance from A to B is 57Volts.

The first step to solving ur problem is finding the resultant force acting on the ball. This can be done by drawing one of those cross-hair things. I will do my best to demonstrate how, using only characters on the ASCII pallette.

*
*
o*
...
| ...
| ...
| ...

... = roof
o = ball
| = Force of weight =mass x accel due to grav= 0.35 x 9.8 = 3.43
* = The normal reaction force of the roof (acting perpendicular to the roof)

If you place a crosshair on the system so the the middle is on the body and one line is parallel to the normal force of the roof and the other is offset 30 degrees clockwise to the force of weight.

You can say that the forces acting perpendicular to the roof are ballanced since there is no change in velocity in a perpendicular direction with respect to the roof. Taking the perpendicular componant of the Weight using trig would be 3.43Cos30 and therefore the normal force would be 3.43Cos30. This means that the resulatant force ends up going down the roof 3.43Sin30 = 1.175N

Put that into F=ma (resultant force = mass x accel) to get

1.715 = 0.35a therefore a = 0.6ms^-2 down the roof

substitute this value into v=u+at to get v=0.6 x2.55 = 1.53

DO THE REST UR SELF. Maybe i have helped u enuf to do so

it has been an honour to answer ur question. If u need more help chat 2 me on msn on mceddy2001@hotmail.com. Soz about the blabber but i can't draw the diagrams on here so i need 2 explain more. If u want me 2 draw a better diagram in paint i will be happy providing i have the time
 
sorry my diagram which i spend ages on got ruined by the system. Many apologies it seems to have taken out all of the necessary spaces.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K