Effect of an uncharged sphere touched to charged sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of touching a charged sphere with an uncharged sphere on the electric force between two identical charged spheres. The original poster presents a scenario involving two positively charged spheres and a neutral sphere, questioning how the interaction affects the charges and the resulting electric force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the movement of charges when a neutral sphere touches a charged sphere, questioning how this affects the distribution of charge. There is discussion about whether the charge is halved and the implications of distance between spheres.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions regarding charge distribution and the conditions under which charges are shared. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of charges during contact, but there is no explicit consensus on the implications of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition of the need for specific conditions to be met for the charge to be equally shared, including considerations of distances and the presence of other charges. The discussion also touches on the potential confusion surrounding the number of spheres involved in the problem.

5.98e24
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical metal spheres, each with a positive charge q, are separated by a centre-to-centre distance r. What effect will the following change have on the magnitude of the electric force exerted on each sphere by the other:

-one sphere is touched by an identical neutral sphere, which is then taken far away


Homework Equations


F2 / F= q1q2 / q1q2

where F is the initial electrical force, and F2 is the final electrical force.

The Attempt at a Solution


I looked at the solutions manual and it says this:

14wzi11.jpg


I just don't understand why one of the charges is halved. What does this have to do with the neutral sphere?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what happens when the neutral metal sphere is touched to a charged metal sphere. Do the charges stay put?
 
gneill said:
Think about what happens when the neutral metal sphere is touched to a charged metal sphere. Do the charges stay put?

Since the stationary sphere is positive, that means that when a neutral sphere approaches it, the electrons in the neutral sphere will move towards the stationary sphere.

I don't know how that explains the halving of the charge, though.
 
5.98e24 said:
Since the stationary sphere is positive, that means that when a neutral sphere approaches it, the electrons in the neutral sphere will move towards the stationary sphere.

I don't know how that explains the halving of the charge, though.

The sphere's touch. Are the electrons going to be satisfied moving only to the surface of the neutral sphere?

Also, you need not think about what the particular charge carriers are. Just think about the net charges on each sphere. The positive sphere has q positive charges. The neutral sphere has no charge. The positive charges on the charged sphere would like to get away from each other...
 
The electrons will move to the side with a positive charge. So the neutral sphere will become positively charged, and the previously positive sphere becomes negatively charged?
 
5.98e24 said:
The electrons will move to the side with a positive charge. So the neutral sphere will become positively charged, and the previously positive sphere becomes negatively charged?

Almost right. The previously positively charged sphere will become LESS positively charged. Charges stop moving once there is no potential difference to drive them. If the spheres have identical dimensions, then the charge will be split equally between them.
 
gneill said:
Almost right. The previously positively charged sphere will become LESS positively charged. Charges stop moving once there is no potential difference to drive them. If the spheres have identical dimensions, then the charge will be split equally between them.

So you mean that q1 = q2 now? And since the charge is split equally, q1 = q2 = q/2?
 
5.98e24 said:
So you mean that q1 = q2 now? And since the charge is split equally, q1 = q2 = q/2?

That would appear to be the logical conclusion :smile:
 
gneill said:
That would appear to be the logical conclusion :smile:

Great! Thanks a lot!

So this relationship holds true involving any two spheres of equal dimensions, as long as one is neutral and the other is either positive or negative to any magnitude, right?
 
  • #10
5.98e24 said:
Since the stationary sphere is positive, that means that when a neutral sphere approaches it, the electrons in the neutral sphere will move towards the stationary sphere.

I don't know how that explains the halving of the charge, though.

I agree with you that to say the excess charge is equally shared by the two spheres coming in contact is questionable. In my opinion, it's a HUGE assumption.

I would only be confident in the halving of the charge if when the two spheres are in contact, then each of them is the same distance from the third sphere. Otherwise, the third sphere will tend to push more than half of the excess charge onto the more distant of the two spheres.
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
I agree with you that to say the excess charge is equally shared by the two spheres coming in contact is questionable. In my opinion, it's a HUGE assumption.

I would only be confident in the halving of the charge if when the two spheres are in contact, then each of them is the same distance from the third sphere. Otherwise, the third sphere will tend to push more than half of the excess charge onto the more distant of the two spheres.
What if there is no third sphere? Just two spheres?
 
  • #12
5.98e24 said:
What if there is no third sphere? Just two spheres?

Which two spheres?
 
  • #13
SammyS said:
Which two spheres?

The ones in my original question. There were only 2 to start with.
 
  • #14
SammyS said:
I agree with you that to say the excess charge is equally shared by the two spheres coming in contact is questionable. In my opinion, it's a HUGE assumption.

I would only be confident in the halving of the charge if when the two spheres are in contact, then each of them is the same distance from the third sphere. Otherwise, the third sphere will tend to push more than half of the excess charge onto the more distant of the two spheres.

We can be sneaky and specify that the two contacting spheres are equidistant from the third sphere.

It's not clear that poster 5.98e24 has covered induction charges in his course as yet.
 
  • #15
If your question is: "What if two identical conducting spheres touch, will any excess charge be equally shared by the two spheres?" , then the answer is: "Yes, provided that they are isolated from any other charges object or externally produced electric field."
 
  • #16
gneill said:
We can be sneaky and specify that the two contacting spheres are equidistant from the third sphere.

It's not clear that poster 5.98e24 has covered induction charges in his course as yet.

I'm a her .. :)

I did learn about induction, but that was a while ago. I haven't touched physics in a few years.

Thanks for all the help! Greatly appreciated!
 
  • #17
5.98e24 said:
I'm a her .. :)

My apologies :smile:
 
  • #18
gneill said:
We can be sneaky and specify that the two contacting spheres are equidistant from the third sphere.

It's not clear that poster 5.98e24 has covered induction charges in his course as yet.
It's still not clear whether 5.98e24 has covered induction charges, even after her response.

We could also move the single charged sphere to a very distant location while the other two touch, then bring it back to the original position after the other two separate.

5.98e24 is a puzzling name. It could represent a bit less than 10 moles.
 
  • #19
SammyS said:
5.98e24 is a puzzling name. It could represent a bit less than 10 moles.

Or the mass of the Earth in kg.
 
  • #20
That makes much more sense. Gives me an idea for 5.98e24's name, but I'll only post the guess if she's game.
 
  • #21
5.98e24 said:
The ones in my original question. There were only 2 to start with.

In the original problem, 3 shperes are involved.
Sphere A and B has qA, qB charge, C has zero charge.

A and C touches, so A shares half of the charge with C.
Then C is taken far away.
 
  • #22
Quinzio said:
...
A and C touches, so A shares half of the charge with C.
Then C is taken far away.

Only under specific conditions will they share exactly half the charge.
 
  • #23
In the 1st message it is clearly said that the spheres are identical. What other conditions to take account of ?
The closeness of the other charged sphere ?
mmm ok, but I guess this is far from the problem aim.
 
  • #24
SammyS said:
That makes much more sense. Gives me an idea for 5.98e24's name, but I'll only post the guess if she's game.
Be my guest!

Quinzio said:
In the original problem, 3 shperes are involved.
Sphere A and B has qA, qB charge, C has zero charge.

A and C touches, so A shares half of the charge with C.
Then C is taken far away.
Ah right! I forgot about that.

Quinzio said:
In the 1st message it is clearly said that the spheres are identical. What other conditions to take account of ?
The closeness of the other charged sphere ?
mmm ok, but I guess this is far from the problem aim.
They're 10cm apart and attract each other with a magnitude of 3.0 x 10^-6 N. I don't think it matters though.
 
  • #25
My guess is Terra.
 
  • #26
SammyS said:
My guess is Terra.

Creative, but no :) Nice try though !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K