Effective Action for Scalar and Fermion Fields

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The black vegetable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effective action
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Using effective action to derive the one loop contribution of aa scalar field and fermion field
I am reading Peskin and Schroeder Section 11.4. They derive a formula for the effective action p.372 Equation 11.63 using a scalar field interaction,
They use this formula to determine the effective potential. If I want to do the same for a Lagrangian with with a scalar field and fermion field, can I use the same Formula reasoning and technique to get a formula for a scalar field and fermion field?

[tex] \Gamma \left ( \phi _{cl} \right )=\int d^{4}L_{1}\left [ \phi _{cl} \right ]+\frac{i}{2}\log\text{Det}\left [ \frac{\partial ^{2}L_{1}}{\partial \phi \partial \phi } \right ] - i\: Connected\: Diagrams+\int d^{4}x\delta L\left [ \phi _{cl} \right ].\tag{11.63}[/tex]

If so do you treat the Dirac Fermion [tex]\bar{\Psi } \Psi[/tex] as two different fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the same formula also for fermionic fields, but you must be aware that these fields must be described as Grassmann-number valued and that the differentiation and integration with respect to Grassmann numbers/fields are modified. This is all necessary to get the anticommutation properties of the corresponding field operators correctly mapped to the functional formalism.
 
Ok Thanks, very helpful I have some notes on Grassmann variables that I will revisit, but can I start as Peskin and Schroeder did with a new Lagrangian but this time containing a scaler field and a fermionic field expanding both
## \phi \rightarrow \phi _{cl}+\eta ##
##\Psi \rightarrow \Psi _{cl}+\xi##

Then comparing the ##\eta^{2}## to get a value for ##\frac{\delta ^{2}L_{1}}{\delta \phi \delta\phi }##

Or maybe I'm not following it very well
 
The general technique is the same for fermions and bosons. You have to be only careful with the signs for the fermionic case using Grassmann variables. Peskin&Schroeder also treats fermions in the path-integral formalism (Sect. 9.5).

Another very good book using the path-integral formalism from the very beginning is

D. Bailin and A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Field Theory,
Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston (1986).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The black vegetable
vanhees71 said:
The general technique is the same for fermions and bosons. You have to be only careful with the signs for the fermionic case using Grassmann variables. Peskin&Schroeder also treats fermions in the path-integral formalism (Sect. 9.5).

Another very good book using the path-integral formalism from the very beginning is

D. Bailin and A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Field Theory,
Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston (1986).
Okay thanks for your help