Effective Charge on Valence Electrons of Sb

  • Thread starter Thread starter BugzBunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Electrons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The effective charge experienced by the valence electrons of antimony (Sb) is calculated using Slater's rules, specifically the formula Zeff = Z - 0.35a - 0.85b - c. For Sb, with a nuclear charge (Z) of 51, the calculation yields Zeff = 51 - 0.35(4) - 0.85(18) - 28, resulting in an effective charge of 6.3. The ambiguity in the interpretation of the 4d electrons as either contributing to b or c was noted, but the calculation provided is accurate based on the grouping of the electron configuration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Slater's rules for effective nuclear charge calculation
  • Familiarity with electron configurations and quantum numbers
  • Knowledge of the periodic table and atomic structure
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Slater's rules in different elements
  • Explore the concept of electron shielding and its impact on Zeff
  • Learn about the implications of effective nuclear charge on chemical properties
  • Investigate advanced quantum chemistry concepts related to electron interactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers focusing on atomic structure and electron behavior in elements, particularly in understanding the effective charge of valence electrons.

BugzBunny
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given Slater's expression for effective charge below, determine the effective charge experienced by the valence electrons of Sb.

Homework Equations


Zeff = Z - 0.35a - 0.85b - c
Where
Z= the nuclear charge; a= the number of s and p electrons in the same shell; b= the number of s and p electrons in the shell one deeper; c= the remaining electrons

The Attempt at a Solution


I have grouped the electron configuration as such:
[1s2] [2s2 2p6] [3s2 3p6] [3d10] [4s2 4p6] [4d10] [5s2 5p3]

Zeff = 51 - 0.35(4) - 0.85(18) - 28 = 6.3

Is this the correct interpretation? My course notes and the problem's formulation are ambiguous so that the 4d electrons could be construed as a factor of b (× 0.85) or of c (× 1).

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
91K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K