Effective Resistance of an Infinitely Long Ladder of Resistors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the effective resistance of an infinitely long ladder of resistors, each with resistance R. Participants are exploring the implications of adding additional resistors to the circuit and how this affects the overall resistance between two points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss modeling the equivalent resistance as a single resistor and setting up equations based on series and parallel combinations of resistors. There are attempts to derive a quadratic equation for the effective resistance and questions about the correctness of these equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to approach the problem, including suggestions to simplify the circuit and use the quadratic formula. There is an ongoing exploration of the expressions derived for the equivalent resistance, with no explicit consensus on the correctness of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the effective resistance remains unchanged when adding new resistors to the circuit. There is also a note about ensuring that the terms in the derived equations have consistent units.

malindenmoyer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Find the effective resistance (resistance between a and b) of an infinitely long ladder of resistors, as shown in the figure, each having resistance R.

http://people.tamu.edu/~malindenmoyer/fig.jpg

The point is that the input resistance which we do not yet know--call it R--will not be changed by adding a new set of resistors to the front end of the chain to make it one unit longer. But now, adding this section, we see that this new input resistance is just R1 in series with the parallel combination of R2 and R. We get immediately an equation that can be solved for R.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you consider Req. at a'b' line, then R and Req are in parallel and other 2 R are in series with them. Simplify the circuit and solve the quadratic to find Req..
 
still confused, perhaps a more detailed hint?
 
Hello malindenmoyer,

A very important part of this is your quote,

"[Req] will not be changed by adding a new set of resistors to the front end of the chain to make it one unit longer."

So take Req as the equivalent resistance looking to the right of line a'b'.

Model Req as a single resistor if you want, at this point. Now find the equivalent resistance once you add in the extra three R resistors, between points ab and a'b'. Find the equivalent resistance of that (you'll have 4 resistors total. 2 series R, in series with an R and an Req in parallel).

But you know from your above quote, that the equivalent resistance of that new circuit (above paragraph) won't change the equivalent resistance before the 3 new resistors were added. So you can set the whole thing equal to Req. Then solve for Req.
 
Okay, from both of the responses, I was able to come up with this expression, am I on the right track?

[tex]R_{eq}^2-\frac{2R^2-1}{R}R_{eq}-1=0[/tex]

If correct, do I use the quadratic formula to solve?
 
malindenmoyer said:
Okay, from both of the responses, I was able to come up with this expression, am I on the right track?

[tex]R_{eq}^2-\frac{2R^2-1}{R}R_{eq}-1=0[/tex]

If correct, do I use the quadratic formula to solve?

Yes, you will be using the quadratic equation/formula for this one. But I don't think your equation is correct.

Hint: Each term in the equation (in the form aReq2 + bReq +c = 0) needs to have units of [tex]\Omega ^2[/tex] (meaning 'a' is unitless, 'b' has units of [tex]\Omega[/tex], and 'c' has units of [tex]\Omega^2[/tex]).
 
Req = 2R + [ R*Req/(R + Req).]
Now simplify and solve for Req.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K