Effects of size and speed on model airplane crashes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correlation between material failure and collision speed in model airplanes, specifically addressing the effects of size and speed on crashes. The user seeks an equation that relates an object's length and speed to material failure during one-dimensional elastic collisions with rigid barriers, considering factors like elastic modulus and specific strength. Key insights include the importance of kinetic energy (KE = 0.5mV²) and the role of mass and flexibility in crash dynamics. Recommendations include reviewing the Taylor impact test and structural impact theories for a deeper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy calculations (KE = 0.5mV²)
  • Familiarity with material properties such as elastic modulus and specific strength
  • Knowledge of one-dimensional elastic collision principles
  • Basic concepts of structural impact and flexibility in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Taylor impact test as discussed in the paper by Wilkins and Guinan
  • Study buckling theory related to material failure in collisions
  • Examine the book "Structural Impact" by Jones for advanced insights
  • Explore the dynamics of flexible materials in model airplane design
USEFUL FOR

Model airplane enthusiasts, aerospace engineers, material scientists, and anyone interested in analyzing crash dynamics and material failure in lightweight structures.

wolfv
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am looking for an equation that correlates material failure and collision speed;
so that I can better understand the effects of size and speed on model airplane crashes.

Is there an equation that correlates an object's length and speed to material failure,
for one-dimensional elastic collision of into a rigid barrier,
given elastic modulus and specific strength?

This is a guess:
specific strength :: speed^2 * length​
but it's probably more complicated than that.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm aware of a general rule that says light models bounce but have never seen anyone do a rigorous analysis.

How about looking at the energy..

KE = 0.5mV2

That has to be absorbed by the structure flexing on impact.

Looks like two factors matter.. The mass and the flexibility.

Some modern indoor RC planes are very light and very flexible, their structure can be distorted considerably without breaking so the available "stopping distance" is quite large and the resulting deceleration and impact forces quite low. I'm thinking of planes similar to this that are made of thin carbon fibre rod.

http://www.hobbyexpress.com/images_products/528613_large.jpg
 
For plastic flow in 1D, look up the paper by wilkins and guinan on the taylor impact test. My instinct is that you might need to look at bucking theory. Try the book structural impact by jones.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K