Undergrad Efficiency of cycles bounded by two isotherms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Koeck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycles Reversible
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the efficiency of reversible cycles bounded by two isotherms, specifically comparing them to the Carnot cycle. It establishes that the efficiency of these cycles is determined by the maximum and minimum temperatures during the isothermal processes, denoted as Tmax and Tmin. The efficiency formula derived is e = (Tmax - Tmin) / Tmax - (TminH + δC)) / QH, highlighting that as the temperature difference between the hot and cold reservoirs increases, the efficiency also rises. The discussion concludes that only the Carnot engine and specific engines with regenerators achieve efficiency solely based on the temperatures of the isotherms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic cycles, particularly the Carnot cycle.
  • Familiarity with concepts of isothermal processes and temperature differentials.
  • Knowledge of entropy and its role in thermodynamics.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for interpreting the efficiency equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Carnot cycle efficiency and its implications in thermodynamics.
  • Explore the role of temperature differentials in enhancing cycle efficiency.
  • Investigate the impact of regenerators on the efficiency of thermodynamic cycles.
  • Learn about other thermodynamic cycles and their efficiencies compared to the Carnot cycle.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in optimizing thermal efficiency in energy systems.

Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
I want to consider all possible reversible cycles that consist of an isothermal expansion at TH and an isothermal compression at TC.
The other two processes can be isochoric, isobaric, adiabatic or anything else, but they should never leave the temperature range between the two isotherms.
I also want to explicitly exclude heat recycling using a regenerator.
Pressure and volume of the system should always remain finite and the temperature is always finite and larger than 0 K.

Is there a general proof that the Carnot cycle has a higher efficiency than all other cycles considered above?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Let ##dQ_H## be the differential increments of heat received by the engine during the heating part of the cycle, ##dQ_C## be the increments of heat rejected by the engine during the cooling part of the cycle, ##T_{max}## be the maximum temperature during the heating part of the cycle, and ##T_{min}## be the minimum temperature during the cooling part of the cycle. Then, $$\int{\frac{dQ_H}{T}}=\frac{Q_H}{T_{max}}+\delta_H$$where ##\delta_H## is positive (since T < ##T_{max}##). Similarly, $$\int{\frac{dQ_C}{T}}=\frac{Q_C}{T_{min}}-\delta_C$$ where ##\delta_C is positive (## since T > ##T_{min}##). So, $$\Delta S=\frac{Q_H}{T_{max}}+\delta_H-\frac{Q_C}{T_{min}}+\delta_C=0$$Therefore, $$Q_C=\frac{T_{min}}{T_{max}}Q_H+T_{min}(\delta_H+\delta_C)$$So the efficiency is $$e=\frac{Q_H-Q_C}{Q_H}=\frac{T_{max}-T_{min}}{T_{max}}-\frac{T_{min}(\delta_H+\delta_C)}{Q_H}$$
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, Dale, TSny and 1 other person
Chestermiller said:
Let ##dQ_H## be the differential increments of heat received by the engine during the heating part of the cycle, ##dQ_C## be the increments of heat rejected by the engine during the cooling part of the cycle, ##T_{max}## be the maximum temperature during the heating part of the cycle, and ##T_{min}## be the minimum temperature during the cooling part of the cycle. Then, $$\int{\frac{dQ_H}{T}}=\frac{Q_H}{T_{max}}+\delta_H$$where ##\delta_H## is positive (since T < ##T_{max}##). Similarly, $$\int{\frac{dQ_C}{T}}=\frac{Q_C}{T_{min}}-\delta_C$$ where ##\delta_C is positive (## since T > ##T_{min}##). So, $$\Delta S=\frac{Q_H}{T_{max}}+\delta_H-\frac{Q_C}{T_{min}}+\delta_C=0$$Therefore, $$Q_C=\frac{T_{min}}{T_{max}}Q_H+T_{min}(\delta_H+\delta_C)$$So the efficiency is $$e=\frac{Q_H-Q_C}{Q_H}=\frac{T_{max}-T_{min}}{T_{max}}-\frac{T_{min}(\delta_H+\delta_C)}{Q_H}$$
Thanks! That's a great proof.
 
The temperatures of the isothermal processes determine the efficiency of cycles bounded by two isotherms, like a Carnot cycle. As the temperature difference between the hot and cold reservoirs grows, efficiency rises.
 
thulsidass said:
The temperatures of the isothermal processes determine the efficiency of cycles bounded by two isotherms, like a Carnot cycle. As the temperature difference between the hot and cold reservoirs grows, efficiency rises.
I would say only the Carnot engine and certain other engines with regenerators have an efficiency that's only determined by the temperatures of the isotherms.
 
thulsidass said:
The temperatures of the isothermal processes determine the efficiency of cycles bounded by two isotherms, like a Carnot cycle. As the temperature difference between the hot and cold reservoirs grows, efficiency rises.
Can you explain more precisely? What do you mean by "cycles bounded by two isotherms, like a Carnot cycle"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K