Efficiency of Mag Lev Transportation: Discuss Benefits/Drawbacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dissident Dan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the efficiency of magnetic levitation (maglev) transportation systems, particularly monorails, comparing them to traditional surface contact-based transportation. Participants explore various aspects including energy consumption, costs, and the mechanics of different maglev technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the lack of friction in maglev systems is a potential advantage, but question the energy required to lift the train off the ground.
  • Others argue that while maglev systems may have higher efficiency due to reduced friction, the energy costs associated with lifting the train could negate these benefits.
  • A participant highlights the distinction between different types of maglev systems, mentioning that some use a Halbach array to induce magnetic current, which may be cheaper but offers less propulsion efficiency.
  • Concerns are raised about the significant power needed to operate electromagnets for lifting heavy trains, with some questioning the overall efficiency of such systems.
  • Another participant mentions that superconductors could potentially eliminate the energy cost for lift, as the only energy required would be to maintain the superconductors at low temperatures.
  • There is a mention of the high electricity demands for maglev systems, particularly in comparison to traditional trains.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the efficiency of maglev systems, with no consensus reached regarding the overall energy costs versus benefits. Some agree on the advantages of reduced friction, while others emphasize the high energy requirements and costs associated with maglev technology.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions regarding energy consumption, costs, and the mechanics of maglev systems without resolving these complexities. The discussion includes references to specific technologies and their implications for efficiency.

Dissident Dan
Messages
244
Reaction score
1
This is a thread to discuss the efficiency of magnetic levetation a la monorails. I really don't know how it would compare to the traditional surface contact-based transportation. If you have some knowledge on this or know where to find it, please speak up.

The lack of friction would definitely be a plus. However, you have to provide the energy to lift the object(s) off the ground.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Greetings !

I don't really know about the energy comparison,
I'm pretty sure the efficiency is higher because
you don't use motors but the energy is abviously
probably greater. The primary problem with such
trains is not the energy but rather the costs of
the monorail which is extremely high (several million
dollars per mile for the train in Japan, for example).

Live long and prosper.
 
Originally posted by Dissident Dan
This is a thread to discuss the efficiency of magnetic levetation a la monorails. I really don't know how it would compare to the traditional surface contact-based transportation. If you have some knowledge on this or know where to find it, please speak up.

The lack of friction would definitely be a plus. However, you have to provide the energy to lift the object(s) off the ground.

We must distinguish between the different types of maglev. There is the http://www.skytran.net/press/sciam01.htm, which uses the motion of the train along the track to induce magnetic current in the track, using a Halbach array. This tech is cheaper to build, because generators are not needed to power the track. But it offers less savings, because the magnets cannot be used for propulsion. The main savings here is just lower friction.

Then, there are the more traditional

electromagnet maglevs,which are much more expensive and complicated to build, but offer additional benefits. In this scheme, the propulsion of the train is powered by a stationary source external to the train. This means that the power source is not part of the weight that needs to be transported.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
doesn't a lot of power have to be used to run the electromagnets that lift the entire weight of the train?
It seems that a maglev train would be highly inefficient, but very quiet, fast and smooth.
Can somebody verify this?

because in a train with wheels, the lift is provided by the contact of the train with the ground. so let's say the train weights 7x10^6kilograms.
you have to power enough electromagnets on the train, and on the ground to lift 7x10^6kg, as well as enough forward force to accelerate the train as well as fight off the forces of wind drag... unless I'm missing something.. it sounds very inefficient
 
Last edited:
tot said:
doesn't a lot of power have to be used to run the electromagnets that lift the entire weight of the train?
Hence the quest for suitable superconductors goes on ...
 
Not my area, but from what I have read an object lifted by a virtual magnet superconductor, does not use "any" energy for the lift. The only energy is to keep the superconductor COLD! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_levitation
So when the force of gravity and the magnet/virtual magnet repulsion equal, the object floats.
 
I saw the wire on the rail for high speed train.(300km/h) i ever saw the cable with very big diameter for mag-left train in shanghai(about 400-450km/h). so i think the mag lev need much more electricity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
21K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K