Efficient Factorial Calculation in Python: Recursive vs. Iterative Methods

  • Context: Python 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Whovian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Python
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Whovian
Messages
651
Reaction score
3
I tried the following code:

Code:
def factorial(n):
    if (n == 0):
        return 1
    else:
        return n*factorial(n-1)

def ncr(n,r):
    return ((factorial(n))/(factorial(r)*factorial(n-r)))

number = 0

for n in range(100):
    for r in range(100):
        print ncr(n,r)

Basically, for all n and r from 1 to 100, it's supposed to print ##\binom{n}{r}##

Unfortunately, running from the command line, I get:

Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "Pythontest.py", line 14, in <module>
    print ncr(n,r)
  File "Pythontest.py", line 8, in ncr
    return ((factorial(n))/(factorial(r)*factorial(n-r)))
  File "Pythontest.py", line 5, in factorial
    return n*factorial(n-1)
  File "Pythontest.py", line 5, in factorial
    return n*factorial(n-1)
  File "Pythontest.py", line 5, in factorial
    return n*factorial(n-1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to have [itex]0 \le r \le n[/itex]. your definition of factorial goes into an infinite callback if [itex]n < 0[/itex].
 
Also, for general purposes...factorial is not defined for negative numbers, so, you should enhance your 'def factorial' and guard (validate) against negative numbers and possibly raise an exception, etc...you know, for when you use this def in a more complex program.
 
Dickfore said:
you have to have [itex]0 \le r \le n[/itex]. your definition of factorial goes into an infinite callback if [itex]n < 0[/itex].

Oh. Oops.

gsal said:
Also, for general purposes...factorial is not defined for negative numbers, so, you should enhance your 'def factorial' and guard (validate) against negative numbers and possibly raise an exception, etc...you know, for when you use this def in a more complex program.

Also sound advice.
 
May I ask why you are doing it recursively? It's not particularly efficient in Python when done that way.

Code:
def rfac (x):
    return x * rfac (x-1) if x > 0 else 1
    
def ifac (x):
    f = 1
    for i in range (1, x+1):
        f *= i
    return f

from timeit import Timer
print (Timer ("rfac(20)", "from __main__ import rfac")).timeit()
print (Timer ("ifac(20)", "from __main__ import ifac")).timeit()

$ python fac.py
10.4178638458
5.76771497726

There are much faster ways to compute it, if you search the web.

Edit: I am not sure I would check or throw for negative input. There's defensive programming, and there's paranoia. It should not happen in practice. I admit this is personal style. I understand there cases where it might (web app), but seriously ... use a precomputed lookup table of N! if it's a web app.