Efficient Techniques for Solving Complex Integrals | Help with Definite Integral

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around techniques for solving a complex integral involving a rational function with a polynomial denominator. Participants explore methods such as the residue theorem and contour integration, while addressing the nature of the roots of the denominator and their implications for the integral's evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral and expresses difficulty in applying the residue theorem due to complicated roots of the denominator.
  • Another participant suggests using a contour from negative infinity to positive infinity and discusses the even nature of the function, proposing a semicircular contour for evaluation.
  • There is a discussion about the need to determine the imaginary parts of the roots of the denominator, with one participant questioning how to ascertain which roots have positive imaginary parts.
  • A detailed examination of the discriminant of the quadratic equation for the roots is provided, with an analysis of conditions under which the roots may be complex or real.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the roots being real and positive on the integral's convergence, suggesting that if any roots are real and positive, the integral may diverge.
  • One participant proposes that if the discriminant is negative, the roots will be complex conjugate pairs, leading to a specific contour choice for integration.
  • Further exploration of the angles associated with the roots is suggested, including the calculation of the argument to ensure the correct placement of the poles in the complex plane.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the roots and their implications for the integral. There is no consensus on the conditions under which the roots are positive or negative, nor on the best contour to use for evaluation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex mathematical reasoning that depends on the specific values of parameters \(a\) and \(b\). The implications of the discriminant and the nature of the roots are not fully resolved, leaving open questions about the behavior of the integral.

jazhemar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having a tough time with this integral:

$$\int_{0}^\infty \frac{x^2 \, dx}{x^4+(a^2+\frac{1}{b^2})x^2+\frac{2a^2}{b^2}}$$
where $$a, b \in \Bbb R^+$$ I tried using the residue theorem, but the roots of the denominator I found are quite complicated, and I got stuck.

What contour should I use? Is there an alternative method? I would appreciate any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably need to assume that the imaginary parts of the roots are positive. I would go with the contour of negative infinity to positive infinity, and then do a semicircle back. That is, do this:
\begin{align*}
f(z)&=\dfrac{z^2}{z^4+(a^2+1/b^2)z^2+2a^2/b^2} \\
I&=\int_0^{\infty}f(z) \, dz \\
2I&=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(z) \, dz, \qquad \text{because} \; f(z) \; \text{is even}.
\end{align*}
Then compute
$$\int_{-R}^R f(z) \, dz$$
along the real axis, and compute
$$iR\int_{0}^{\pi}f\Big(Re^{i\theta}\Big) \, e^{i\theta} \, d\theta,$$
where $z=R e^{i\theta}$. My hunch is that the semicircle part will be zero, and you can probably show that by the $ML$ inequality.

You are going to need to horse through the roots of the denominator, because you'll have
$$\lim_{R\to\infty}\left[\int_{-R}^Rf(z) \, dz+\int_{0}^{\pi}iR \,f\Big(Re^{i\theta}\Big) \, e^{i\theta} \, d\theta\right]=\sum_j\text{Res}[f(z_j),z_j],$$
and to find the residues, you'll need the roots of the denominator. They're really not that bad:
$$z^2=\frac{-a^2b^2-1\pm\sqrt{a^4b^4-6a^2b^2+1}}{2b^2}.$$

I think they're all simple roots, so you can compute the residues by
$$\text{Res}[f(z_j),z_j]=\lim_{z\to z_j}(z-z_j)f(z).$$

Can you continue?
 
Thank you! But, how do I know for which of those four roots are the imaginary parts positive?
 
jazhemar said:
Thank you! But, how do I know for which of those four roots are the imaginary parts positive?

So let's examine the equation
$$z^2=\frac{-a^2b^2-1\pm\sqrt{a^4b^4-6a^2b^2+1}}{2b^2},$$
which describes all four poles of $f(z)$. First of all, note that the discriminant
\begin{align*}
a^4b^4-6a^2b^2+1&=a^4b^4-2a^2b^2+1-4a^2b^2 \\
&=(a^2b^2-1)^2-4a^2b^2 \\
&=(a^2b^2-1-2ab)(a^2b^2-1+2ab) \\
&=(a^2b^2-2ab+1-2)(a^2b^2+2ab+1-2) \\
&=((ab-1)^2-2)((ab+1)^2-2).
\end{align*}
This might help you get a handle on where the roots lie, given the locations of $a$ and $b$.

Now, I don't know what the RHS is fully, but since the quadratic equation in $z^2$ has all real coefficients, then both of these solutions, if they are complex, come in complex-conjugate pairs. As a matter of fact, if any of these roots are real and positive, then the original integral blows up along its contour. I don't think this happens, though, and here's why:

\begin{align*}
(a^2b^2+1)^2&=a^4b^4+2a^2b^2+1 \\
&>a^4b^4-6a^2b^2+1,
\end{align*}
and hence
$$a^2b^2+1>\sqrt{a^4b^4-6a^2b^2+1}.$$
So, if the discriminant is positive, the square root of its magnitude is less than the negative thing being added to it. So when you take the positive sign, you get a negative, and when you take the negative sign, you get something even more negative. So there cannot be any positive real values of $z^2$.

I suppose there could be negative real roots, in which case the contours I suggested in my previous post would run right over them; you can either change your contour to be only in the first quadrant (You can't go on the imaginary axis, because a negative value of $z^2$ would square root to be on the imaginary axis! You'd need to do, say, from $0\le\theta\le\pi/4$), or you need to impose a condition on $a$ and $b$ such that this discriminant is negative, and you get only complex conjugate values for $z^2$.

So, let's suppose that is the case (and with the factors above, hopefully it will be a bit easier to find out when that happens): the roots of the quadratic in $z^2$ are complex conjugate pairs. That means $z^2=r e^{\pm i\theta}$ for some positive real $r$, and $0<\theta<\pi$. Finally, we have the four poles located at
$$z=\sqrt{r} \, e^{i\theta/2}, \; \sqrt{r} \, e^{-i\theta/2}, \; -\sqrt{r} \, e^{i\theta/2}, \; -\sqrt{r} \, e^{-i\theta/2}.$$
The first and last of these, if you think it through, will have positive imaginary part.

So, what is $\theta$? Well, we know that
$$\tan(\theta)=\frac{\text{Im}(z^2)}{\text{Re}(z^2)}.$$
Work out what that is, and you should be on your way. Don't forget to make sure $0<\theta<\pi$ by adding or subtracting $\pi$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K