Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I tried to find the Eigenstate of the angular momentum operator myself, more specifically I tried to find a Function [itex]Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)[/itex] with

[tex]L_zY_{lm}=mħY_{lm}[/tex] and [tex]L^2Y_{lm}=l(l+1)ħ^2Y_{lm}[/tex]

where [tex]L_z=-iħ\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}[/tex]

and [tex]L^2=-ħ^2(\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(\sin\theta\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta})+\frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial^2\phi})[/tex]

These representations can be found here.

Now lets look at the simple case of [itex]m=l=0[/itex]. The standard solution here is [itex]Y_{00}(\theta,\phi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}[/itex]. However, it seems like the function [itex]Y_{00}(\theta,\phi)=A\ln(\cot\theta+\csc\theta)[/itex] is as well a solution to the differential equations above, since [itex]\frac{\partial Y}{\partial \phi}=0=mħY[/itex] and [itex]\frac{\partial Y}{\partial \theta}=-A\csc\theta[/itex] and therefore [tex]L^2Y=-ħ^2(\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(-A \sin\theta\csc\theta))=0=l(l+1)ħ^2Y[/tex]

Since [tex]\int_0^\pi YY^*\sin\theta d\theta[/tex] converges (you can look at the graph here) it is possible to find an [itex]A[/itex] that normalizes [itex]Y_{00}[/itex].

So where is the mistake? I did not find this solution anywhere.

Thank you for your help :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operator

Loading...

Similar Threads - Eigenfunctions angular momentum | Date |
---|---|

I Eigenfunctions and collisions | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Simultaneous eigenfunctions | Mar 29, 2017 |

I Understanding eigenfunctions | Feb 23, 2017 |

Eigenstates of Orbital Angular Momentum | Feb 9, 2016 |

Common sets of eigenfunctions in angular momentum | May 30, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**