Eigenvalues/Eigenstates of Spin Operator S in xz Plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the spin operator S for an electron in the xz plane, as outlined in Zettili's Quantum Mechanics textbook. The key equations are S|m>= h m|m> and n.S|m>= (h/2) m|m>. The confusion arises from the factor of 1/2 in the second equation, which is clarified to indicate that m represents integer quantum numbers rather than half-integer values. This distinction resolves the discrepancy in expected results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically spin operators.
  • Familiarity with the notation and terminology of quantum states and eigenvalues.
  • Knowledge of angular momentum in quantum systems.
  • Experience with mathematical manipulation of quantum equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of spin operators in quantum mechanics, focusing on the xz plane.
  • Learn about the implications of integer versus half-integer quantum numbers in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of angular momentum projections in quantum systems.
  • Review the notation and conventions used in quantum mechanics textbooks, such as Zettili's.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying spin systems and eigenvalue problems, will benefit from this discussion.

rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the spin operator S of an electron in the direction
of a unit vector n; assume that n lies in the xz plane.

Homework Equations



S|m>= h m|m>


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is from Zettili QM and they have written:

n.S|m>= (h/2) m|m>

I do not understand why are they taking a half.
If I take m=1/2 in S|m>= (h/2) m|m>, I get h/4 but the answer should be h/2, by using S|m>= h m|m>.
So where am i going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m is the quantum number. you need to check its definition
 
Of course it is a quantum number but why is there a half?
 
It's probably just a typo. It doesn't really matter, though. It just means the quantum numbers are ##\pm1## instead of ##\pm 1/2##.
 
I see now. The notation in the two equations is not consistent.
S|m>= h m|m>
n.S|m>= (h/2) m|m>
In the second equation, m is a 'quantum number' (i.e. integer), while in the first equation I guess you could interpret m as the value of the projection of angular momentum, in natural units.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K