Is Lambda = 1 an Eigenvalue of the Given Matrix?

Click For Summary
Lambda = 1 is confirmed as an eigenvalue of the given matrix, as it satisfies the eigenvalue equation Av = λv for some non-zero vector v. The process involves setting up the system of equations derived from the matrix and solving for the eigenvectors. The discussion highlights that the equations lead to a non-unique solution, indicating multiple eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue. Additionally, the characteristic equation derived from the determinant must be solved to find all eigenvalues, with a cubic polynomial indicating the presence of other eigenvalues. The user is reminded that while they have identified the polynomial, they need to ensure that it correctly reflects the eigenvalue condition.
matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that lambda = 1 is an eigenvalue of the matrix

2,-1, 6
3,-3, 27
1,-1, 7

and find the eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenvectors


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand how to actually get eigenvalues and eigenvectors
could someone help me out please
=]
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you understand the definition of "eigenvalue"? "\alpha" is an eigenvaue of matrix A if and only if there is some non-zero vector, v, such that Av= \alpha v.

In particular, "1" is an eigenvalue of this matrix if and only if
\begin{bmatrix}2 &-1 & 6 \\ 3 & -3 & 27 \\ 1 & -1 & 7\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= 1\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}
for some not all of x, y, z zero.

Multiplying that left side gives
\begin{bmatrix}2x- y+ 6z \\3x- 3y+ 27z \\ x- y+ 7z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}

Now, solve that using whatever method (row reduction, determinants, etc.) you choose. The most basic is to write that as the system of equations
2x- y+ 6z= x, 3x- 3y+ 27z= y, and x- y+ 7z= z. Those are the same as x- y+ 6z= 0, 3x- 2y+ 27z= 0, and x- y+ 6z= 0.

Notice that the first and second equations are the same- we really have only two equations, not 3 and so there is no unique answer. That had to happen. Obviously, v= 0 is a solution to Av= \alpha v for any A and \alpha. Saying there is a non-zero vector such that that is true means there is NO "unique" answer.

Getting back to our equations: if we multiply x- y+ 6z= 0 by 2 we get 2x- 2y+ 12z= 0 while the second equation above was 3x- 2y+ 27z= 0. Subtracting 2x- 2y+ 12z= 0 from that, x+ 15z= 0 so x= -15z. That's as far as we can go, we cannot solve for a specific 5value of x. But putting x= -15z into x- y+ 6z= 0 gives -15x- y+ 6z= 0 or y= -7z.

What does that mean? That means that any vector of the form v= <15z, -7z, z> satisfies Av= v, no matter what z is. Any such vector, for non-zero z, is an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue \lambda.

More generally, if Av= \lambda v, then Av- \lambda v= (A- \lamba I)v= 0. The point of writing it that way is that equation always has the solution v= 0 and will have a non-zero answer only if v= 0 is not unique. If A- \lambda I had an inverse matrix, then we could multiply on both sides by that inverse and get the unique answer v= (A- \lambda I)^{-1}0= 0. That is, Av= \lambda v has a non-zero solution if and only if A- \lambda I is not invertible which is the same as saying it has determinant 0.

The "eigenvalue equation" or "characteristic equation" for matrix A is "det(A- \lambda I)= 0". For your example, that is
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}2-\lambda &amp; -1 &amp; 6 \\ 3 &amp; -3-\lambda &amp; 27 \\ 1 &amp; -1 &amp; 7-\lambda \end{array}\right|= 0
Working out that determinant on the left will give you a cubic polynomial equation (the "eigenvalue equation" or "characteristic equation" for an n by n matrix is typically an n^{th} degree polynomial). Since you already know that \lambda= 1 is a solution, you can reduce it to a quadratic equation for the other two eigenvalues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


ok i got to the cubic polynomial and just want to check that i have the right polynomial

im rubbish with latex so let x = lambda

x3+6x2+20x=0

i then simplified to get

-x(x2-6x-20)=0
 


matt_crouch said:
ok i got to the cubic polynomial and just want to check that i have the right polynomial

im rubbish with latex so let x = lambda

x3+6x2+20x=0

i then simplified to get

-x(x2-6x-20)=0
Unfortunately, there is one serious problem with that! Remember that you were asked to show that "1" is an eigenvalue? (It is.) But 1^3+ 5(1)+ 10= 26, not 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K