Eigenvalues of Hamiltonian operator

Juli
Messages
24
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Consider a system with two spin-1 particles, which is described by the Hamiltonian operator

## H = \lambda \vec{S}_1 \cdot \vec{S}_2 ##

with ##\lambda \in \mathbb{R} ##.

1. Express H in terms of the total spin ## \vec{S} = \vec{S}_1 + \vec{S}_2 ##.

2. What eigenvalues does H have and how are these degenerate?
Relevant Equations
##\vec{S}^2 = S(S+1)\hbar^2##
##\vec{S_1}^2 = S_1(S_1+1)\hbar^2##
##\vec{S_2}^2 = S_2(S_2+1)\hbar^2##
Hello, I try to solve this problem, and I think a) wasn't too hard, I have the following solution:

##H = \lambda (\frac{\vec{S^2-(\vec{S_1}^2+\vec{S_2}^2)}{2})##.
I struggle with 2. I find it very abstract. When I have H as a matrix I know how to calculate eigenvalues, but I don't know how to proceed with this general approach.

I tried to go somewhere with the eigenvalues of S, but I didn't get far...

Can someone help me solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the right-hand side of the operator ##~S^2=(\vec S_1+\vec S_2)\cdot(\vec S_1+\vec S_2)~## and solve for the operator ##\vec S_1\cdot \vec S_2##. Its eigenvalues are the eigenvalues of the operator on the right-hand side.
 
I did the first task and got this ##H = \lambda (\frac{\vec{S^2-(\vec{S_1}^2+\vec{S_2}^2)}{2})##
But I don't know how to get the eigenvalues of the operator on the right-hand side. Are they the eigenvalues of the individual spins?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top