Eigenvalues of Observables A, B, and C in the Eigenstate Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter McLaren Rulez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstate Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the eigenvalues of the observables A, B, and C in a quantum-mechanical system with a Hamiltonian that has two energy eigenstates. The original poster seeks to understand the relationships between these observables and their eigenstates, as well as whether they commute with the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of matrix representations for the operators A, B, and C, and how to derive eigenvalues from given matrix elements. There are questions about the dimensionality of the matrices based on the Hamiltonian's eigenstates.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the implications of the matrix forms of the observables and their relationships to the Hamiltonian. Some have suggested methods for calculating eigenvalues and checking commutation, while others are questioning assumptions and clarifying definitions. There is no explicit consensus on the final eigenvalues or the commuting relationships.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the eigenvalues of observable A due to an unknown matrix entry, and participants are considering the implications of Hermitian properties on the matrices. The discussion also touches on the conditions under which observables may or may not commute with the Hamiltonian.

McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



The Hamiltonian of a quantum-mechanical system has only two energy eigenstates, namely |1> and |2>. The system has three other properties, denoted by the observables A, B, and C, respectively. The normalized eigenstates |1> and |2> may or may not be eigenstates of A, B, or C. Find, as many as possible, the eigenvalues of the observables A, B, and C by making use of the following known matrix elements:

(a) [itex]<2|A|2> = 1/3, <2|A^{2}|2> = 1/9[/itex]

(b) [itex]<1|B|1> = 1/2, <1|B^{2}|1> = 5/4, <2|B|2> = 0[/itex]

(c) [itex]<1|C|1> = 1 , <1|C^{2}|1> = 5/4, <1|C^{3}|1> = 7/4[/itex]

Comment briefly on whether the observables commute with the Hamiltonian.

2. The attempt at a solution

If a state is an eigenstate I can write it as [itex]a|a>[/itex]. So |2> is an eigenstate of A with eigenvalue 1/3. The states |1> and |2> are not eigenstates of B and C. Is this part correct?

From this, we know that B and C don't commute with the Hamiltonian but A might (depending on whether |1> is also an eigenstate).

That's about all I can get from this problem. I get the feeling that I'm not using a lot of the information so can someone help me figure out more eigenvalues for A, B and C and whether A commutes with H. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the matrix representations of the operators. For example, from the information given, you know that A can be represented by the matrix
[tex]A=\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & 1/3 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]
in the [itex]\{\vert 1 \rangle, \vert 2 \rangle\}[/itex] basis. Then square the matrix and use the fact that [itex]\langle 2 \vert A^2 \vert 2 \rangle = 1/9[/itex] to solve for the other matrix entries, if you can. The fact that A is an observable also places constraints on the allowed values of the entries.
 
vela, how do you know that the matrices are 2x2? Is it because the Hamiltonian is 2x2 (since it has two eigenstates) and so every other observable for this system must be of the same dimension?

Using your argument, I got the following results:

[tex]A=\begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & 1/3 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]B=\begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & b \\ 1/b & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]C=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & c \\ 1/(4c) & 1/2 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

The matrices must be Hermitian but I'm unable to use that condition to get rid of the variables unless the entries are real, and I don't see why that must be the case.
 
McLaren Rulez said:
vela, how do you know that the matrices are 2x2? Is it because the Hamiltonian is 2x2 (since it has two eigenstates) and so every other observable for this system must be of the same dimension?
Yup.
Using your argument, I got the following results:

[tex]A=\begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & 1/3 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]B=\begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & b \\ 1/b & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]C=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & c \\ 1/(4c) & 1/2 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

The matrices must be Hermitian but I'm unable to use that condition to get rid of the variables unless the entries are real, and I don't see why that must be the case.
Looks good so far, though you should recheck <2|C|2>. I got that it was equal to 1. For matrix B, you found bc=1, and because the matrix is Hermitian, you must also have c=b*. So you get bc=bb*=|b|2=1; therefore, b can be written as e for some θ. You can do a similar thing for matrix C.

With these matrices, you should be able to find all the eigenvalues, and with the matrix H for the Hamiltonian, you should be able to show whether the operators A, B, and C commute with the Hamiltonian. Note that B and C can commute with H if a certain condition holds.
 
vela, how do you know <2|C|2> is 1?

Anyway, as of now, I can find the eigenvalues for B and C by the usual way but I cannot do it for A because the entry a is unknown. So is this as far as we can go for eigenvalues or is there a way to find out the second eigenvalue of A?

Now, regarding the commutation with H, I thought B and C definitely don't commute with H? If they did, |1> and |2> would be eigenstates of B and C but they are not. With A, I realize it does commute.

Thank you for your help.
 
McLaren Rulez said:
vela, how do you know <2|C|2> is 1?
I calculated it. How did you get <2|C|2>=1/2?
Anyway, as of now, I can find the eigenvalues for B and C by the usual way but I cannot do it for A because the entry a is unknown. So is this as far as we can go for eigenvalues or is there a way to find out the second eigenvalue of A?
That's the best you can do.
Now, regarding the commutation with H, I thought B and C definitely don't commute with H? If they did, |1> and |2> would be eigenstates of B and C but they are not.
That's not necessarily true. Suppose, for example, the matrix for H was the identity matrix. Clearly, H would then commute with B and C.

H usually won't commute with B and C, but it will under one condition. You should be able to deduce what that condition is.
 
Ok I see my C matrix was wrong.

Regarding the condition, well now that you pointed it out, any multiple of the identity matrix would allow them to commute i.e. the two states have the same eigenvalue for H. Or is there a stronger condition?
 
Last edited:
You can deduce what the exact condition is mathematically. Just calculate HB and BH and figure out under what conditions they are equal.
 
Ok here is what I did.

[tex]H=\begin{pmatrix} p & 0 \\ 0 & q \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]B=\begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & b \\ 1/b & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]HB=\begin{pmatrix} p/2 & pb \\ q/b & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]BH=\begin{pmatrix} p/2 & qb \\ p/b & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

So, they commute if p=q which is what I got previously.
 
  • #10
Right, and you can see there's no other condition that allows H and B to commute.
 
  • #11
Thanks very much vela.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K