Eigenvectors of rotation matrix

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 7K views
timon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question is from Principles of Quantum Mechanics by R. Shankar.

Given the operator (matrix) [itex]\Omega[/itex] with eigenvalues [itex]e^{i\theta}[/itex] and [itex]e^{-i\theta}[/itex], I am told to find the corresponding eigenvectors.

Homework Equations



[itex] \Omega = \left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos{\theta} & \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -\sin{\theta} & \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array} \right][/itex]
[itex] \Omega \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2 \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -x_1 \sin{\theta} + x_2 \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right] [/itex]
[itex] e^{i\theta} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> x_2 \cos{\theta} + x_2 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right][/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector [itex](x_1, x_2)^T[/itex] and demand that the resulting vector is equal to [itex](e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T[/itex]. From this i get the condition that [itex]x_2 = ix_2[/itex]and [itex]x_1 = -ix_2[/itex], which implies that [itex]x_1 = x_2 = 0[/itex]. Am i missing something crucial?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
timon said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector [itex](x_1, x_2)^T[/itex] and demand that the resulting vector is equal to [itex](e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T[/itex]. From this i get the condition that [itex]x_2 = ix_2[/itex]and [itex]x_1 = -ix_2[/itex],
Typo? I think you mean [itex]x_2 = ix_1[/itex] here. In which case these two equations are really the same equation.

which implies that [itex]x_1 = x_2 = 0[/itex]. Am i missing something crucial?
No, it does not imply that. Let x1=1 (and worry about normalization later), then what is x2?
 
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time. Are these the correct eigenvectors?

[itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] [/itex]
 
Are these the correct eigenvectors?

[itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] [/itex]
Yes, that's right.

timon said:
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time.
That's weird. From your equations in Post #1, you get
[tex]x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2\sin{\theta} = x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta}[/tex]
which by inspection implies [itex]x_2 = i x_1[/itex], not [itex]x_2 = i x_2[/itex]
 
It is indeed quite amazing that I managed to screw the same trivial manipulation up three times in a row, always in the same manner. Thank you for the help.