Eigenvectors of rotation matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvectors of a rotation matrix associated with the operator (matrix) \(\Omega\) from quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the eigenvalues \(e^{i\theta}\) and \(e^{-i\theta}\). Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the conditions derived from the matrix's action on a generic vector.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the rotation matrix to a generic vector and the resulting conditions for the eigenvalues. There is a focus on the relationships between the components of the eigenvectors and potential errors in reasoning.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, questioning the assumptions made regarding the relationships between the components of the eigenvectors. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in earlier reasoning, and further exploration of the eigenvector forms is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their calculations and the normalization of eigenvectors, as well as the correctness of their derived relationships. There is a noted concern about consistency in the manipulation of indices in their equations.

timon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question is from Principles of Quantum Mechanics by R. Shankar.

Given the operator (matrix) \Omega with eigenvalues e^{i\theta} and e^{-i\theta}, I am told to find the corresponding eigenvectors.

Homework Equations



<br /> \Omega = \left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos{\theta} &amp; \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -\sin{\theta} &amp; \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array} \right]<br />
<br /> \Omega \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2 \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -x_1 \sin{\theta} + x_2 \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right] <br />
<br /> e^{i\theta} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> x_2 \cos{\theta} + x_2 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right]<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector (x_1, x_2)^T and demand that the resulting vector is equal to (e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T. From this i get the condition that x_2 = ix_2and x_1 = -ix_2, which implies that x_1 = x_2 = 0. Am i missing something crucial?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
timon said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector (x_1, x_2)^T and demand that the resulting vector is equal to (e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T. From this i get the condition that x_2 = ix_2and x_1 = -ix_2,
Typo? I think you mean x_2 = ix_1 here. In which case these two equations are really the same equation.

which implies that x_1 = x_2 = 0. Am i missing something crucial?
No, it does not imply that. Let x1=1 (and worry about normalization later), then what is x2?
 
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time. Are these the correct eigenvectors?

<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] <br />
 
Are these the correct eigenvectors?

<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] <br />
Yes, that's right.

timon said:
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time.
That's weird. From your equations in Post #1, you get
x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2\sin{\theta} = x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta}
which by inspection implies x_2 = i x_1, not x_2 = i x_2
 
It is indeed quite amazing that I managed to screw the same trivial manipulation up three times in a row, always in the same manner. Thank you for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K