Einstein velocity transformations problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving Einstein's velocity transformations, focusing on the motion of a frisbee and a bird in different inertial frames. The scenario includes a frisbee thrown north at 0.7c and a bird flying at 0.5c with components in both northward and eastward directions, raising questions about the bird's trajectory toward a birdfeeder from different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of velocity transformations and whether they account for spatial contraction. The original poster attempts to analyze the bird's path in both frames, while others suggest using space-time diagrams to clarify the situation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing guidance on using space-time diagrams and questioning the original poster's setup. There is recognition of the complexity involved in the transformations and the need for further exploration of the concepts presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the term "really" in the context of the bird's trajectory and the implications of Lorentz contraction in the analysis. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the application of the transformations and seeks clarification.

Sleepycoaster
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So I made this problem up to visualize the einstein velocity transformations between inertial frames.

Homework Statement



I throw a frisbee due north. It goes north at a constant velocity of .7c. At the same time I throw it, a bird flies in a straight line at a constant velocity of .5c at such an angle that its northward component is .3c and its eastward component is .4c, relative to the frisbee. It is going toward a birdfeeder located 1 light-minute north and .4 light-minutes east of where I stand. Is the bird really going toward the birdfeeder in both the frisbee's inertial frame and my inertial frame?

Homework Equations



vx = (vx' + β)/(1+vx'β)
vy = (vy'(√1 - β2)/(1-vx'β)

Apostrophied velocities are measured in the frisbee's frame, which moves at velocity "beta" relative to my frame.

The Attempt at a Solution



In the frisbee's frame, the birdfeeder is heading south at .7c. In one minute, it will be .7 light-minutes south of where it was before. The bird moves relative to the frisbee up .3 light-minutes and east .4 light-minutes, so it should meet the birdfeeder in one minute.

In the home frame,

The northward component of the bird is .3+.7 / 1+(.3)(.7) = .82645
The eastward component of the bird is .4(sqrt(1-.49))/1+(.3)(.7) = .23608

Since .82645/.23608 does not equal 1/.4, the bird is not heading toward the birdfeeder.

I definitely did something wrong to get this contradiction. Would anyone like to try it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the bird really going toward the birdfeeder in both the frisbee's inertial frame and my inertial frame?
... to word "really" does not belong here.

You can check your setup by sketching the space-time diagrams for each observer.
 
You forgot about space contraction which changes the angle towards the location of the bird feeder.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dauto,

Thanks for the reply, but I'm not sure I get it. Wouldn't the Einstein velocity transformations already account for the space contraction between the points of view of me and the frisbee?
 
Okay, I figured it out. From my point of view, the bird flew north at .82645c, but if I were to use a simple Lorentz contraction and multiply this velocity by sqrt(1-(.7)^2), you get a velocity of .5902c north, which, coupled with the .23608c component East, will get the bird to the birdfeeder.
 
Well done - it's easier with the space-time diagrams though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I'm afraid I don't know space-time diagrams very well. Do you mean, a graph with perpendicular axes "time" and "distance" with a second "time" axis at slope 1/.7 and a second "distance" axis at slope .7, all from the origin?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
3K